FINAL
PHASE 2 RFG PERFORMANCE SUBCOMMITTEE
MEETING SUMMARY
JANUARY 17, 1995
I. Introduction
The performance subcommittee discussed the following key
issues regarding the Phase 2 Reformulated Gasoline
performance and compatibility testing program:
On-Road Fleet Composition and Size
Off-Road Vehicle and Equipment Test Program
Distribution and Inspection of Test Fuel
Conduct of the Performance and Compatibility Program
New Vehicle Warranties
The minutes from the November 15, 1994 meeting were approved
with no significant changes. However, the cover sheet for
Chevron's presentation on API fuel tank flammability implied
that the presentation was based on work done by Chevron
instead of API. Copies of presentations given at the
meeting are enclosed with this summary.
II. On-Road Fleet Composition and Size
A table of the on-road fleet composition and size is
attached as part of the draft Memorandum of Understanding.
There are 1035 test vehicles and 817 control vehicles
selected at this time; however, no heavy duty vehicles are
currently represented. ARB staff are continuing to work
with Caltrans to find a suitable selection of heavy duty
vehicles and are likely to test those vehicles separately
from the main on-road test program.
Contact: Nelson Chan (916) 327-1510
III. Off-Road Vehicle and Equipment Test Program
Tecumseh and Briggs and Straton have completed testing.
Tecumseh completed bench testing in November 1994 and
published their findings. They tested 21 engines for their
full expected life, and encountered no performance or
durability problems. The findings of the Tecumseh testing
are outlined in the attached Off-Road Performance Test
Programs presentation. At the meeting, someone requested a
copy of the details from the Tecumseh bench testing; they
are attached as well. Briggs and Straton testing is also
complete and they expect to publish their findings soon.
Additional utility lawn and garden testing is to be done by
U.C. Davis and the Portable Power Equipment Manufacturers
Association (PPEMA). Three marine engine testing programs
are to be conducted by Oronite and Outboard Marine
Corporation in the San Francisco Bay; Oronite and Mercury
Marine in Disney World Florida; Mercury Marine in
conjunction with commercial fisherman in Ventura Harbor.
Two agricultural and industrial test programs will be
conducted by U. C. Davis and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. In
the snowmobile category, the International Snowmobile
Industry Association will be testing rental snowmobiles in
conjunction with Tahoe Winter Sports, and on-road
motorcycles will be tested by the City of Sacramento as part
of the on-road test program.
Contact: Kathleen Nolan (818) 350-6519
IV. Distribution and Inspection of Test Fuel
Test fuel will be distributed from Phillips Petroleum to
California by rail. Test fuel distribution within the state
will be handled by Texaco, and we expect shipping to begin
on January 27, 1995. Fuel samples will be collected at
various locations during fuel shipment, both before
receiving fuel and after. A copy of the hand blend fuel
specifications is attached and the test fuel properties of
the initial shipment will be provided to subcommittee
members at the next meeting.
Contact: Rich Vincent (916) 327-5977
V. Conduct of the Performance and Compatibility Program
The fleet test vehicles will be fully inspected prior to the
beginning of the test program; thereafter, we will have
monthly or bi-monthly visual inspections of fuel system
components. The data collection forms were discussed at the
meeting and were finalized with some minor changes. In the
case that there is a failure, there is a five step procedure
outlined in the Compatibility and Performance Evaluation
Program presentation to evaluate the situation. There will
be two levels of component failure review, the first level
will determine what the failure is and the second level will
determine the actual cause of failure. Subcommittee members
were asked to volunteer for the panel.
Contact: Paul Jacobs (916) 322-7061
VI. New Vehicle Warranties
General Motors and Chrysler issued letters stating that their
warranties would be fully supported if any fuel related problems
occurred in their vehicles. Ford representatives were asked if
Ford would be doing the same. Prior to the meeting Ford had
mailed such a letter to us, but we had not received the letter
prior to the meeting. We will be including a copy of that letter
with this summary.
Attachments
CBG Program Advisory and Subcommittee Activities