Comment Log Display

Dear Air Resources Board,

I would like to copy the following article from forbes!

New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the
Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into
space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new
study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The
study indicates far less future global warming will occur than
United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior
studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far
less heat than alarmists have claimed.
Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at
the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team
Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on
NASA's Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA's
Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist
computer models.
"The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost
to space during and after warming than the climate models show,"
Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release.
"There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts
that is especially big over the oceans."
In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than
alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data
show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before
United Nations computer models predicted.
The new findings are extremely important and should dramatically
alter the global warming debate.
Scientists on all sides of the global warming debate are in general
agreement about how much heat is being directly trapped by human
emissions of carbon dioxide (the answer is "not much"). However,
the single most important issue in the global warming debate is
whether carbon dioxide emissions will indirectly trap far more heat
by causing large increases in atmospheric humidity and cirrus
clouds. Alarmist computer models assume human carbon dioxide
emissions indirectly cause substantial increases in atmospheric
humidity and cirrus clouds (each of which are very effective at
trapping heat), but real-world data have long shown that carbon
dioxide emissions are not causing as much atmospheric humidity and
cirrus clouds as the alarmist computer models have predicted.
The new NASA Terra satellite data are consistent with long-term
NOAA and NASA data indicating atmospheric humidity and cirrus
clouds are not increasing in the manner predicted by alarmist
computer models. The Terra satellite data also support data
collected by NASA's ERBS satellite showing far more longwave
radiation (and thus, heat) escaped into space between 1985 and 1999
than alarmist computer models had predicted. Together, the NASA
ERBS and Terra satellite data show that for 25 years and counting,
carbon dioxide emissions have directly and indirectly trapped far
less heat than alarmist computer models have predicted.
In short, the central premise of alarmist global warming theory is
that carbon dioxide emissions should be directly and indirectly
trapping a certain amount of heat in the earth's atmosphere and
preventing it from escaping into space. Real-world measurements,
however, show far less heat is being trapped in the earth's
atmosphere than the alarmist computer models predict, and far more
heat is escaping into space than the alarmist computer models
predict.
When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed
scientific journal, show a "huge discrepancy" between alarmist
climate models and real-world facts, climate scientists, the media
and our elected officials would be wise to take notice. Whether or
not they do so will tell us a great deal about how honest the
purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are.
James M. Taylor is senior fellow for environment policy at The
Heartland Institute and managing editor of Environment & Climate
News.

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html

Here is PROOF from Nasa that global warming is made up, as in your
case in ab32 as a legal robbery!! 

Can you argue with NASA no! I am asking you to stop the cap and
trade program in California. It is unaffordable, will bankrupt the
state.

Make countless californian's lose their homes,businesses jobs,and
vehicles.

And lastly is has nothing to do with the environment and all to do
with making YOU rich!

Sincerely James Redford!

give me a call carb!