First Name | Alison |
---|---|
Last Name | Freedlund |
Email Address | ali@mattole.org |
Affiliation | Mattole Restoration Council |
Subject | carbon offsets and clearcutting |
Comment | Dear Air Resources Board, Thank you for this opportunity to comment on this important issue. I have managed the Forest Practices Program of the Mattole Restoration Council for over 12 years. I support sustainable land management practices, including careful timber harvests. The idea of cap and trade to help reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GGEs) has some clear benefits if it is within scientifically accepted boundaries that promote less impacts to our air quality. However, the current proposal that would allow even-aged management as an offset for GGEs is completely opposite of the intended purpose. In order to reduce our carbon footprint we must embrace forest practices that will be carbon neutral. The only forest practices that are carbon neutral are ones that promote the growth of standing forests by thinning from below and thereby reduce the threat of catastrophic fire. This type of forestry is called sustainable uneven-aged management. Even-aged management or clearcutting is not carbon neutral. It actually increases impacts to our air quality by cutting down forests that should be sequestering carbon while cleaning our air. Please consider carefully any program with market incentives to ensure that the offset is indeed an improvement to our environment. Clearcuts are not, plain and simple. The proposal as written is a mockery of the intended purpose and would increase the problem we are attempting to solve. Please include language that protects our forests in California as they are becoming one of our most valuable assets in dealing with climate change. Sincerely, Alison Freedlund |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2010-11-22 11:35:56 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.