Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment 6 for Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment (cargo11) - 45 Day.

First NameRobert
Last NameClark
Email Addressrobert_clark@apl.com
AffiliationAPL
SubjectAPL/Eagle Marine response to the Proposed Amendments to CA Mobile CHE @ Ports & IRY
Comment
Clerk of the Board
California Air Resources Board
1001 I Street
Sacramento, CA  95814

Re:  APL/Eagle Marine response to the Proposed Amendments to
California’s Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment at Ports and
Intermodal Rail Yards Regulation

APL/Eagle Marine conducts cargo handling operations at the Port of
Los Angeles and the Port of Oakland.  As such, we are regulated by
the Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment regulations.  In anticipation
of CARB’s September 22nd and 23rd Public Hearing to consider
amendments to this regulation we would like to provide you with our
written comments in regards to the Proposed Amendments to
California’s Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment at Ports and
Intermodal Rail Yards Regulation.

 
1. Additional time for equipment with no VDECS available. 

An extension for equipment with no VDECS available would serve us
well, allowing time for issues such identifying technology that
does not have premature regeneration problems and issues associated
with the VDECS such as burned out glow plugs and other electrical
issues.

2. Require CHE opacity testing and set maximum allowable levels. 

VDEC problems are due to VDECS’s being intolerant of our duty
cycles, not opacity levels.  APL/Eagle Marine keeps the engines of
all equipment well tuned for optimum fuel efficiency.   It is not
in the best interest of our company to have engine gasses upstream
of the VDECS because the VDECS would suffer a greater load and a
shorter run time would surely result. This proposal increases costs
and is superfluous.

3. Allow demonstration of emissions equivalency. 

If an older engine performs at a level that meets all the current,
specific emissions requirements it should be afforded the same
acceptability as a new machine that carries a “Tier IV” label. 
This is a common sense approach to rule making.

4. Add a safety provision for VDECS. 

It is our understanding that OSHA is drafting a visibility
regulation to govern the placement of VDECS.  Although APL/Eagle
Marine has or is in the process of retrofitting equipment we do not
want to install a VDEC only to find out later that we are in
violation of possible pending OSHA regulations. 
5. Manufacturer delays for new equipment. 

It is important to preserve the availability of rental equipment as
needed until such time as the manufacturers issue the updated Tier
compliant engines.  In cases where the equipment is not available,
a longer extension of a minimum of one year or until such time as
new equipment becomes available or the existing becomes equipment
obsolete, whichever comes first.  

6. Warranty engine replacement. 

Allowing the replacement of an engine under warranty with the same
engine type in cases of premature engine failure, even when newer
engine standards are in place is fitting and proper.

7. Treat Tier 4 Engines Certified to Alt PM Emissions Standards as
Tier 3 Engines.

Engine manufacturers must ensure that Tier 4 engines meets Tier 4
specifications, not an Alt PM standard where the end user is
responsible to install additional emission controls /   VDECS.  If
not the user of such equipment will be subject to VDEC retrofit,
requiring extra labor and lost-time.

8. Add flexibility to extension for experimental diesel PM
emissions control strategies. 

Additional compliance flexibility by amending the current
compliance extension for the use of experimental strategies for
non-yard truck equipment is desirable.  In addition CHE
owners/operators may use this extension when it is needed to
generate information for verification.

9. Clarify regulatory language:  definition of port. 

It is important to clarify that diesel - fueled equipment within
the boundaries of the port or intermodal rail yard, including those
at non-port or non-intermodal rail yard related businesses, are
subject to the regulation.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on these proposed
regulatory changes.  APL/Eagle Marine looks forward to dialog with
you at the upcoming public hearing on September 22nd and 23rd in
Sacramento.

Sincerely,



Robert A. Clark, II
Director of Environmental Affairs, Americas
APL
614 Terminal Way
Terminal Island, CA 90731
310-548-8822

Attachment www.arb.ca.gov/lists/cargo11/7-apl_ems_response_ca_che_ports_iry_110919.pdf
Original File NameAPL EMS Response CA CHE PORTS IRY 110919.pdf
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted 2011-09-19 09:51:51

If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.


Board Comments Home