First Name | The |
---|---|
Last Name | Undersigned |
Email Address | theundersigned@gmail.com |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Combination of fees and rebates deserves more attention |
Comment | Here's an alternative that is worth considering. It could be referred to as feebates, since it calls for a combination of fees and rebates, which I believe works most effectively. Rather than prescribing feebates, though, the proposed overall alternative allows its implementation to a large extent to be decided locally. 1. Fees are imposed on polluting products, as a percentage added to the price paid by the consumer. Obvious products are gasoline, electricity produced from fossil fuel, vehicles and equipment that (comparatively) cause a lot of emissions. Such fees could be collected by the Board of Equalization or by a Fund to be set up for this purpose. 2. The revenues of these fees are then distributed back to the city, county or district where they were collected, provided the respective area manages to reduce emissions locally by a certain percentage, set equally across the state for all areas. 3. Where an area fails to meet the target percentage reduction, part of the revenue will default to the state in accordance with the gravity of the failure. In such cases, revenues will be used for state-wide programs aimed at reducing greenhouse gases. 4. Areas that exceed targets will also be offered the (optional) opportunity to collect fees locally, e.g. as part of feebate programs that make vehicles registration more expensive for the most polluting vehicles and less expensive for the cleanest vehicles. The provision under 2. will survive under 4., to encourage that revenues are used for effective local programs to electrify transport and offer rebates on clean energy facilities, feed-in tariffs, etc. State-wide set target percentages could be reviewed regularly, say annually. Areas that exceed the target can use their surplus toward their target the following year. Feebates are most commonly known in the vehicle sector, but they can be equally applied in other sectors. Feebates are attractive because they can be implemented by changing the existing sales tax system, rather than by introducing new taxes. The combination of fees and rebates minimizes leakage. Feebates can also be implemented on a budget-neutral way. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2011-06-22 01:30:09 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.