First Name | John |
---|---|
Last Name | Andrew |
Email Address | jandrew@water.ca.gov |
Affiliation | Assistant Deputy Director, DWR |
Subject | DWR comments on Supplemental FED for AB 32 SP |
Comment | The Department of Water Resources (DWR) has broad responsibilities for water management and planning for California, as well as for the operation of the State Water Project (SWP). DWR is a member of the Governor’s Climate Action Team, has achieved Climate Action Leader status from The Climate Registry, and is actively assisting the California Air Resources Board in implementing the AB 32 Scoping Plan. The Department respectfully submits these comments on the Supplement to the Functional Equivalent Document for the AB 32 Scoping Plan, related to the California Water Plan Update and the SWP. First, the subject document includes unclear statements and mischaracterizations about the California Water Plan Update, the state’s strategic plan for water resources. Specifically, the Supplement states that the Water Plan presents three potential scenarios for conditions in 2050, and that all three scenarios indicate a growing demand for water. In fact, one of the three plausible scenarios, called “Slow and Strategic Growth,” indicates less overall demand for water. More importantly, though, these scenarios are intended to be the basis for measuring the resiliency of future water policies and actions, rather than to simply underscore how much water demand is expected to grow (or not). The document also states, without reference, that water shortages in California may get worse at a “rate of approximately two to three percent per year.” Without citation, it is unclear the basis for this prediction, one that is not included in the Water Plan. Second, DWR remains concerned regarding the allocation of allowances under the Cap & Trade element of the Scoping Plan, as proposed in the current draft regulation. The concern specifically relates to: 1) the equity of declining to provide DWR with allowances reflecting its energy consumption, and instead giving away those allowances to public and private utilities; and 2) the lack of analysis of the potential environmental and economic impacts of Cap & Trade on the SWP and the agencies and consumers that receive SWP water. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2011-07-28 13:21:59 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.