First Name | Harvey |
---|---|
Last Name | Eder |
Email Address | harveyederpspc@yahoo.com |
Affiliation | Public Solar Power Coalition & self |
Subject | Comments Supp. to Scoping Plan FED CARB Part 3 HE PSPC Prt1 Comt. 68, & Prt 2 Comt. 7 3 |
Comment | This is part 3 of Comments due to lack of time (60 min. limit) Part 1 Comment 68 for ceqa-sp11 (NonReg) and Part 2 Comment 73 for ceqa-sp11 (Non-Reg) were send yesterday Jule 27,2011. A confirming email was send only for Part 2 Comment 73 and not for Part 1 Comment 68. Another email was send by me/us to you regarding the need for sending a confirmation email for Part 1 Comment 68 as well as for this Comments Part 3 to be sent today July 28, 2011, herein. In regards to the fee cited in Part 1 Comments 68 this fee should be used for a rebate fund and solar equity conversion fund. One third of it 1/3 would be paid each year to low income people/citizens of California with incomes up to 150% of state/federal poverty level, one third of it 1/3 would be paid to low income peop[le/citizens of California with incomes from over 150% to 200% of state/federal poverty income level, adnthe remaining one third for the first 5 years 1/3 would be spent on a solar conversion equity dividend to finance local state solar conversion entitits. This would be called Solar Cal and would facilitate California conversion to solar renewables as soon as possible. A (as cited in part 1 comments herein ) 202or 10 year solar conversion plan wouold be implemented with a back up 15 yr. and 20 year plan as well as a 30 and 40 for total solar conversion to as direct solar as possible as soon as possible. The 100% of the Dividend /Solar Conversion Equity Fund would also be used for buying up high GWP Global warming Potential emission units like CFC, PFC etc for from $1-$5 per ton equlivlent and held for higher fee amounts for the distirbution in increased value to lowincome consumers and Solar Cal. This will enable the states lowincome consumers to benefit as well as the state from any higher value fees in the future. More work needs to be done on the details of this proposal. Dr. Jane S. Long 2 weeks ago July 15,2011 gave an ARB Chairs lecture with a panel in Sacremento on Californias Energy Future: through to 2050 which is the 80% ghg reduction date refered to in comments 68 part 1 of off 1990 levels by 2050 and the Governors Executive Order S-3-05. She is the Associate Director at Larg and Fellow Center For Global Security Lawerence Livermore Laboratory. Her conclusion was that existing solar thecnology will get to 60% off 1990 reductions of ghg by 2050 and that a "solar silver bullet" can take us the rest of the way... As Marks Jacobson and Delucci of Standford University and UC Davis have detailed as cited in Comments 68 Part1 the solar renewable technology is cost effective now to bring us to solar conversion by 2030 (see incorparated into this record Nov. 2009 Cover Article Scientific American and December 30&31 2010 articles in Energy Policy. CARB has an opportuntiy to lead this why alson with the other state energy related agencies towards immediate total colar conversion through Solar Cal as an example for the nation and the world. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2011-07-28 15:53:22 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.