First Name | Kimberly |
---|---|
Last Name | Burr |
Email Address | kimlarry2@comcast.net |
Affiliation | |
Subject | trading carbon |
Comment | Deforestation is a major climate change problem. Forests around the planet must be increased and mature forests protected NOT traded!! Policing a trading scheme is not a proven model to reduce carbon emissions or CO2 build up. The best scheme, which is feasible only through guidance from government, is to transition to clean energy as quickly as possible as in a cap and dividend system. Many businesses will thrive and achieve efficiencies, advantages, and market share during and after transition. Businesses and lobbies that merely assert that they will be harmed by capping carbon and reinvesting in clean energy must be required to demonstrate through peered reviewed studies, that the economics, even if there MIGHT be some costs incurred, are infeasible. The courts have said that business may sometimes have to incur costs so long as they are reasonable and environmental protection will be realized. The environmental document must analyze the historic impacts of constructively forcing technology through regulation. Increased miles per gallon is one good example. Good regulation creates a level playing field and is forward looking like our major environmental laws were. Industries can change, will change, and will be better competitors in the global economy if they are efficient, nimble,and jump into the niche that is clean renewable energy. It is not in any one's interest to be dictated to by stale and rigid thinking that holds every one back. Please incorporate these elements into the environmental analysis. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2011-07-28 08:11:07 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.