Comment Log Display

John Wilder
720 S. 15th St.
Apt G-2
New Castle, IN 47362
904-860-1172


                     Scientists Trash The Scientific Method

    At least the unethical and/or the leftist scientists do.  The
Scientific Method was invented by Galileo to insure ethical
research protocols independent of popular thinking.  Galileo was
persecuted by the scientific community when his research indicated
that the Earth revolved around the sun instead of the sun revolving
around the Earth.  This contradicted popular consensus of the time.
 He died penniless, persecuted and correct in the face of
overwhelming scientific consensus.
     Today ethical scientists abide by the Scientific Method in
their research.  The unethical scientists and leftists have
abandoned that protocol in favor of “consensus”.  The IPCC, Al Gore
and the media keep talking about consensus about Global Warming
theories.  They don’t talk about any proofs derived through the
Scientific Method because there are none.
      Part of what makes the Scientific Method credible is the
solid foundation that requires any scientific hypothesis to be
verifiable, testable, repeatable and open to critique by any
scientist in the world.  In fact scientific journals are published
to disseminate research findings and make them open to scientific
peers.  In response to that, we have scientists complaining around
the world that they are “blackballed” from getting their refutation
articles printed in scientific journals.  We have had had a
Congressional hearing about the widespread censorship preventing
scientists from coming forward to expose the fraud.  We have had
mainstream professors and research scientists complaining that the
IPCC suppresses any dissenting articles and does not even report
that there are any.  We have Nancy Pelosi openly threatening any
scientists who don’t toe the PC line on global warming to cancel
their research grants.  That is not only a violation of scientific
protocols and the Scientific Method, it is felony extortion. 
Similarly, we have had the head of The Weather Channel, Heidi
Cullen suggesting that any meteorologist who contradicts the global
warming tenants have his credentials revoked.  This is also felony
extortion.  These women have not been called on it much as less
prosecuted.
                ENVIRONMENTALISM IS A SECULAR RELIGION
     We are also troubled by environmentalists who view it a as
secular religion.   For them it is about faith and feelings.  They
can’t be bothered by facts and logic.  Facts and logic do not
resonate with them.  They have adopted an alternative religion and
for them it enables themselves to have a positive self-image.
Whatever is stated in the name of saving the planet is never ever
questioned or fact checked.  To question it or fact check it to the
environmentalist is a Christian’s equivalent to heresy.  It is if
we are denying God’s existence.   Critics are dismissed,
criticized, maligned and rendered irrelevant.  For the
environmentalist, there is no room for discussion.  It is “us
against them”.  The resemblance between radical environmentalists
and cults are eerily similar.
   
     What is observed are the global warming cabal’s own writings.
 They characterize themselves as culturally and intellectually
superior.  They condescendingly refer to anyone who disagrees with
them as:  “The Cro Magnin Fringe”, Deniers, “under-educated”
ignorant and so on.
     Here are some scientific refutation facts that you should be
aware of:  Man caused global warming due to increased CO2 is a
theory based upon a flawed computer model on the part of the IPCC. 
That theory posits that CO2 will rise into the atmosphere and stay
there for 100 years. The IPCC claims that this will be cumulative
and causing a “green house effect” thus causing the earth to warm.
     Here is the scientific refutation.  CO2 has a specific
gravity of 1.52 which means that it is 152% heavier than air and
thus sinks to the ground when released.  This is why we use it in
fire extinguishers.  The CO2 sinks to the ground and starves a fire
from oxygen.  You can’t do away with the Law of Gravity.  Now it is
true that we have wind blown particles of CO2 in the air, just like
we have wind blown dust particles in the air.  The truth is that
when the wind dies down, gravity pulls the dust and the CO2 out of
the air and it settles back down to the ground.  We went from 300
PPM (parts per million) before the Industrial Revolution to 380 PPM
over the last 100 years.  That is an increase of 80 PPM.  The
fractional equivalent of 80 PPM is 8/100,000ths of 1%.  That is a
trace amount by any objective standard.  Trace amounts are allowed
in our food.  The FDA even has standards for trace amounts of rat
droppings in our food.  People urinate in the pool while they are
swimming.  We all know that and yet we all swim in the pool.  The
amount of urine compared to the whole volume of the swimming pool
is so small that it is not a factor.
                                    BLACK BALOONS
     Black Balloons is the title of a commercial that epitomizes
the kind of outright rank fraud being perpetrated by the global
warming cabal.  You can see it for yourself by simply punching it
into your search engine.  Gore touted this commercial in a segment
with Larry King.  It is a slickly and professionally produced
commercial with a voice over narration by Tommie Lee Jones.  It
depicts black balloons ostensibly being filled with CO2 from
different appliances.  The balloons fill and then break free from
the appliance and float up to the ceiling and out a window joining
thousands of other balloons to illustrate how we pollute the
atmosphere.  What is fraudulent is that they filled those balloons
with a lighter than air gas of Helium.  If they had in fact filled
them with CO2, they would have sunk  to the ground.  The media
never made an outcry over this rank fraud.  It is illustrative of
the fraud going on the movement.

     We are told that we are at a “tipping point” and that we are
all in imminent danger thus requiring drastic alterations in our
lifestyle, or at least mitigate it with carbon taxes.
    Around the world, we put billions of cubic feet of CO2 into
the atmosphere from distilling beer, wine and hard liquor.  We also
put billions of cubic feet of CO2 into the atmosphere from bread
making.  We even manufacture billions of cubic feet of CO2 to put
fizz and taste into our soft drinks.  In this country alone, the
per capita consumption of soft drinks is an amazing 47.2 gallons.
Ask yourselves, if we are at a dangerous tipping point that
requires immediate cutbacks of CO2 into the atmosphere, why are the
scientists not asking or demanding that we cease production of
these carbon offending products?  This is of course a rhetorical
question.  The answer is obvious.  The public would revolt and we
would not get any agreement at all to give the radical
environmentalists what they are asking for.
  
      
     In the mainstream media, we have been subjected to numerous
scare tactic claims.  We have been told that:  we are going to have
massive flooding due to glacier melt and ice burgs melting, that we
are going to have “massive saltwater fish kills” due to that same
glacier melting, that polar bears are either going to drown or
starve due to the ice pack melting.  We were previously told that
we were going to have global warming because Freon was eating a
hole in the ozone.
                                          


                                             FLOODING
    One of the big scare tactics by global warming alarmists is
massive flooding due to ice melt.  They conveniently forget to tell
you that Newton’s Third Law of Physics has not been disproved.  His
law states that:  FOR EVERY ACTION, THERE IS AN EQUAL AND OPPOSITE
REACTION.  This means that if we have ice melting due to warming
temperatures, there will be an exponential increase in the rate of
evaporation from the oceans.  This evaporation is part what is
called THE HYDROLOGIC CYCLE.  The Hydrologic Cycle simply means
that the rivers run into the oceans, the sun evaporates water from
the ocean surface, distilling it and removing the salt in the
process, the water vapor rises into the atmosphere where it is
dispensed in the form of rain or snow which falls on the ground and
runs off into the rivers where the rivers run back into the ocean. 
So in actuality, the oceans would actually decrease in height due
to global warming not increase.
     Al Gore stated that the floating ice burgs melting would also
cause flooding in his movie; AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH.  You can
disprove this yourselves because of Archimede’s Law of
Displacement.  You simply fill a Styrofoam cup above the rim with
ice cubes to simulate ice burgs.  You then fill the glass to the
rim with water causing the cubes to float like ice burgs.  Allow
the ice cubes to melt.  You will not have any water leaking over
the side thus easily disproving Mr. Gore’s claim.
              SALTWATER FISH KILLS DUE TO FRESH WATER INFUSION
     We have been warned that there would be massive saltwater
fish kills due to the fresh water infusion into the saltwater
environment from melting ice pack.  This sounds reasonable on its
face.  If you go back to the Hydrologic Cycle, we have rivers
running into the sea all over the world.  Examine The Mississippi
River.  It is the third largest drainage basin in the entire world.
 Its flow rate is 4 million gallons per second.  Now ice melting
could never equal that flow and in spite of it, there are no
saltwater fish kills at the mouth of the Mississippi River.  This
is due to the Diffusion Principle.  You can be reminded of that
Diffusion Principle back to the urination in the pool.  
        
          POLAR BEARS DROWNING DUE TO MELTING ICE PACK

    If you look up in any scientific text, you will find that
polar bears are classified as marine mammals like seals or walrus. 
You will also note that in that text, it will tell you that polar
bears can swim 60 miles non-stop at a speed of 6 mph, more than
twice as fast as a human.  Drowning is not a factor in a healthy
polar bear.

                POLAR BEARS STARVING DUE TO MELTING ICE PACK
     Polar bears primary diet is seal pups.  Seals try and protect
their pups by hiding them in snow caves below the ice surface. 
Bears smell the pups in the caves and try and catch them by
breaking the ice surface to reach the cave and the pup.  Bears are
only successful in about 1 out of 6 attempts.  If the ice pack
melted, then the seals would be forced to having their pups on
land.  This would result in a veritable buffet of seal pups for the
bears, thus causing the bear population to actually increase due to
the extra food available.  It is a little known fact that animals
increase or decrease their rate of reproduction according to the
available food in their habitat.
   GLOBAL WARMING DUE TO FREON EATING A HOLE IN THE OZONE
     Remember that scare tactic back in the 1970’s?  Scientists
have quietly backed away from that claim.  This is because we
outlawed Freon in 1989 and it has made no difference in the ozone. 
The difference it has made is to increase the cost of an
alternative coolant over 500%.  Despite the fact that their theory
was disproved, scientists have not made such an admission and
pushed for re-legalization of Freon which is much cheaper for
cooling.
    Confronted with this contradiction to their theory, scientists
are now claiming that it is CO2 which is causing a “Green House
Effect”.  There was never an actual hole in the ozone.  There was
only a seasonal shift in the thickness of the ozone layer at the
poles.  The thinning is a natural occurrence due to the fact that
it at the poles where the earth spins on its axis.  This would
naturally cause what is defined as a vortex.  You see a thinning of
the air in the center of a tornado which is another naturally
occurring vortex.  The thinning changes during the seasons because
of Boyles Law and Charles Law of Gasses.  Scientists never bothered
to explain their theory in view of the evidence that:  Gasses have
no magical magnetic properties that would cause them to race
thousands of miles to the poles and then magically re-concentrate
themselves into this toxic soup to eat a hole in the ozone.  They
also did not bother to explain how Freon could then rise up into
the Troposphere where the thinning occurs since Freon is a heavier
than air gas weighing 134% more than air.  Scientists also did not
bother to explain why there was no atmospheric thinning over the
land masses in the warmer climates like Florida and California and
Mexico  where the Freon was actually released.

                                        Global Cooling
     NASA quietly and without fanfare corrected their temperature
records because a blogger reminded them that the warmest year on
record was actually back in 1934 during the Great Dust Bowls.  This
is long before the expansion of the Industrial Revolution and its
corresponding increases of CO2.
    We have had atmospheric cooling for the last 8 years with
record lows being set around the world.  For example, San Francisco
never got above 71 degrees in June this year for the first time
ever since we have been keeping temperature records.  This flies in
the face of global warming theory and is an utter contradiction. 
Scientists and Mr. Gore have quietly changed their rhetoric to talk
about “climate change” instead of global warming in the face of
overwhelming evidence.
     Now that Congress is poised to inflict carbon taxes and Cap
and Trade legislation, it would behoove us to look at both sides of
the issue which are conspicuously absent in the mainstream media. 
Carbon taxes are sure to be a business killer.  We are in a deep
recession with thousands of businesses going belly up.  There are
tens of thousands more businesses, just barely hanging on. 
President Obama said during his campaign he “he would tax
businesses out of business if they did not meet his carbon
requirements”.  Businesses need to start lobbying Congress for
their own survival.

     What then as a society should be our role?  Should we blindly
accept increased costs and taxes based upon a flawed and disproved
theory ?  My answer is no, what is yours?  What will you do about
it to give voice to your concerns?  End of Submission