First Name | John |
---|---|
Last Name | Dodds |
Email Address | jdoddsgw@sbcglobal.net |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Greenhouse Emissions |
Comment | Your law is a fraud. Repeal it. A paper is available at www.scribd.com called Gravity causes Climate Changes. http://www.scribd.com/doc/27343303/Gravity-Causes-Climate-Change It claims that the IPCC and GCMs FAIL to properly implement the Greenhouse Effect, by 1. ignoring that the amount of energy photons coming into the Earth limits the GHE, and 2. instead claiming that the simple addition of CO2 without added energy, causes warming in violation of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and 3. An additional source of incoming energy in the force of gravity and gravitational potential ennegy has been totally ignored in the IPCC analysis. In simple terms, Svante Arrhenius in 1896 said that in order to get the GreenHouse warming Effect (GHE), you must add an energy photon to a greenhouse gas (GHG) which delays the photon's transport to space by a few nanosonds thus causing more warming. The GHE results in about 11% (32/287) of the Earths temperature due to the fraction of the spectrum of energy photons that can be absorbed and released a few nanseconds later. The IPCC however claims that you just need to add a GHG to the air to get the GHE.(AR4, WG1, Ch1, p116). Clearly the latter is impossible since you can not increase the temperature witout adding an energy photon without violating the Law of Conservation of Energy. It is claimed that the IPCC mechanism is only valid as the Earth's atmosphere is coming up to energy equilibrium, when there would exist sufficient excess energy to provide the GHGs with the required absorbable photon of energy. Once the Earth reaches equilibrium when all the energy coming in is equal to the energy going out, and with both the Water Vapor and CO2 absorbtion spectra saturated or absorbing 100% of the absorbable photons, then the addition of any more GHGs will not result in any more GHE warming because there are no longer any absorbable photons available. This then results in an EXCESS of the GHGs in the air. The proof is simple- When you add more WV to the air, as when the humidity goes from a "normal" 33% to 100% when it rains, there is no increase in the GHE warming of the air. By the IPCC logic you would expect the WV GHE to triple from 32C to 96C. This does not happen because all of the absorbable photons are already in use. ie the absorbtion spectra for WV (& CO2) are saturated. This is why all of the Water in the oceans has not become water vapor in use by the GHE. The addition of more GHGs just results in more excess GHGs in the air, not more warming. The idea of excess GHGs is also supported by the fact that whenever the temperature decreases, every night, every winter etc, then the amount of GHGs in use causing the GHE also decreases. This results in more GHGs becoming excess. Since the temperature is below the record highs and since man has added more CO2, then under normal average conditions today on Earth there is excess GHGs. If there is excess then then any increase is dictated by the energy coming in and out, and it would use the excess first (as it does every morning) rather than waiting until man adds more excess. Now if there is excess GHGs and no available energy, then the IPCC/Models contention that more CO2 results in more feedback warming by WV, also is impossible. due to the lack of energy photons. Similarly the contention that more clouds will result in more positive feedbacks is also impossible if there are no available energy photons, even while in the lab more WV/clouds should result in more warming or posotive feedback IF THE PHOTONS WERE AVAILABLE. With the invalidation of the feedback models, then all derivations of forcing functions which depend on the models are also invalid. The terminology that a Greenhouse Gas "traps" an energy photon to cause the Greenhouse Effect is incorrect and misleading. The photon is absorbed and released within nanoseconds as the energized GHG molecule collides with other air molecules and returns the energy to the air. The concept that the energy is trapped is absurd. Since the GHE actually causes about an 11% temperature increase or (32C/287C on average), then if the energy photons were trapped for a significant period of time, say 10 days, let alone the 50+ years of disequilibrium claimed by Hansen, the air would have absorbed all of the energy that would have come in in a single day (ie 11% times 10 days=110%) yet the dailytemp increase is on the order of 10 to 15 degrees C, but the increase in the GHE only claims 0.8 degrees per century. Clearly trapping does not happen. You do not see individual GHG molecules at 900C. They are all at air temperature. In summary, the GISS/HADCRU/IPCC models are so flawed as to be totally worthless. They fail to model the reality of conditions on Earth. They mis-apply the GHE. If more CO2 does NOT cause more warming, then there is no reason to Cap or reduce emissions. However as Hansen points out, the increasing temperature data is complete enough to document that warming exists, the data on incoming energy , the sole source used in the models, has essentially not increased since the 1960s, so there MUST be some other source of energy, eg gravity, that is causing the very real warming. see the paper referenced above for further explanation. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2010-03-24 20:08:00 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.