Comment Log Display

I do not understand why the proposed changes to the current ZEV
programme have been put forward.

Plainly the EV is here to stay and is being produced in ever
growing numvbers by companies such as Tesla whci is based in
California.

Europe is already embracing the EV and this will only increase in
future years.  

In short, I do not know where you got your numbers from.

I therefore propose the following:


1) Increase not decrease the minimum number of Pure ZEV required
in Phase III (2012-2015);

2) Eliminate the substitution of Pure ZEVs with Enhanced
AT-PZEVs;

3) Set the minimum ZEV requirements on a yearly basis rather than
for three years, thus preventing manufacturers from getting an
additional three year grace period and eliminating “blackout”
years;

4) Change the carry forward provision of gold ZEV credits earned
by any manufacturer that exclusively manufactures pure ZEVs to
expire 3 years from the date of transfer to another manufacturer.

With these actions the Air Resources Board will once again be able
to recapture its credibility and assume the mantle of leadership in
advancing the goal of true zero emissions transportation in the
state of California and beyond.

Peter J Hedge