First Name | Patrick |
---|---|
Last Name | Griffith |
Email Address | bigzoostinks@gmail.com |
Affiliation | |
Subject | EV owner viewpoint |
Comment | Greetings! I'd like to offer the following views as an owner of a plug-in hybrid vehicle. A couple of concerns I’ve noticed in my experience: 1) Not sure if this is part of the regulation, but please consider any "pay-wall" barriers to public recharging stations. For example, many of the charging stations in downtown LA assess fees on an energy equivalent basis that are more expensive than gasoline. To my knowledge, no one is reviewing these fees. If there are credits for these stations in this (or some other) regulation, the credits should be valued according to the favorability for the potential user (i.e., free charging stations should have higher value than fee-based stations, and stations charging more than gasoline should get zero credits). 2) If the regulation offers credits for EVs based on the potential range capable under electric power, please consider whether or not the ranges stated by manufacturers are for a fresh battery or for a battery after many recharging cycles when its range is greatly diminished. For example, the EV I own had a much higher range off the lot than it does now. Consider also that even with the existing purchasing incentives, the cost of ownership is still much higher than for a comparable gasoline powered vehicle. Battery replacement costs (likely in my case) should be considered - these will certainly wipe out any "advantage" from the state/federal incentives. Consider regulation if battery life is diminished by a certain percentage within a certain time window (i.e., if range is reduced by 40% within two years or 40,000 miles, battery replacement costs should be borne by the manufacturers). Thanks! |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2014-10-20 13:14:19 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.