Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 2 for Public Meeting to Discuss Universities, Legacy Contracts, and 'But For CHP' under the Cap-and-Trade Program (may1-unilegbutfor-ws) - 1st Workshop.
First Name: Nicholas
Last Name: Balistreri
Email Address: nick.balistreri@ucop.edu
Affiliation: University of California
Subject: Re: Public Meeting for Universities, LC, and 'But For' under Cap and Trade
Comment:
The University of California (UC) support s the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) staff proposal to provide transition assistance through the allocate allowances to universities. If adopted in its current form the regulatory amendments will relieve UC approximately $8 million per year in cap and trade fees and allow it to continue to invest in greenhouse gas reducing projects across its campuses. Under the proposal, universities would receive an allocation based on the average emissions during 2008-2010 from each of its facilities regulated under the cap and trade program. The allocation would then be reduced each year, keeping in line with the same allowance reduction in the overall cap and trade program. UC believes this is a fair and equitable solution to the directive given to CARB staff by its board (Resolution 12-33, September 20, 2012). Nevertheless, UC is concerned about clarity regarding incorporating the future growth of its facilities that are not currently obligated under the cap and trade program. Several of its campuses are under the 25,000 mtCO2e threshold, but expect to surpass it as they fulfill their educational and research mandates. During the workshop CARB staff also expressed these concerns and proposed having the other facilities opt-in so that they would be eligible to receive an allocation. UC supports this solution, but requests the regulations state a defined period of time after adopting the new regulations that the campuses can decide to opt-in, or not, to the cap and trade program to receive the allocation for transition assistance. The additional language will assure UC will not have to opt-in facilities prior the regulations receiving final Board approval. UC welcomes the allocation methodology proposed by CARB staff. UC believes the transition assistance will aid in its ability to continue to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to the benefit of California and it looks forward to continue working with CARB staff on the final proposed regulatory language.
Attachment:
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2013-05-16 16:07:49
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.