Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 18 for Comments on regional targets for SB 375 (sb375-targets-ws) - 1st Workshop.
First Name: Gerald
Last Name: Cauthen
Email Address: Cautn1@aol.com
Affiliation:
Subject: Meeting State GHG Emission Reduction Targets - CARB's Role
Comment:
Dear Mr. Ito, First, I want to commend you for running a first rate public meeting in Oakland last week. Your willingness to give people an opportunity to express themselves, and to listen attentively, was a refreshing change from what Bay Area residents usually encounter in such meetings. Following are a few thoughts in addition to those recently forwarded to Ms. Nichols (letter attached). As I noted in the letter and in testimony, people will not reduce their driving unless a viable non-automotive alternative is in place. While this seems obvious, it is a factor that is often neglected, particularly by those focused only on serving low-income and minority people. When too many cars clog Bay Area streets and highways everyone…including the transit-dependent… loses. After four decades of rhetoric about returning to a more balanced Bay Area transportation system, our public transit systems remain poorly connected and otherwise deficient. Given the Region’s dismal transportation history, it is clear that the situation will not "self-correct". Significant outside pressure from CARB and the State of California will be required to bring about needed transportation changes in the Greater Bay Area. Following are a few of the gaps and inefficiencies that are evident in the Region’s existing network of bus and rail lines. With determination and commitment, these deficiencies could be eliminated in a timely manner. · San Francisco’s Muni Metro system is currently operating at far below capacity, thereby deterring thousands of would-be riders a day because of excessive crowding during rush hours, · When completed the Caltrain extension to San Francisco's new Transbay Terminal will quickly render that facility the most important nexus of transit systems west of New York City. Yet the Caltrain extension is habitually subordinated to a politically-inspired, virtually useless short bit of subway extended a third of the way into Chinatown. · To complete the connection between the buses and trains accessing the new Transbay Terminal and the Market Street subways, underground moving ramps linking the new terminal to the mezzanine level of the Embarcadero BART Station are planned. However the importance of this vital pedestrian link continues to go largely unrecognized, and the underground connection consequently languishes for a lack of funds, · Another way of giving San Francisco-bound commuters from San Mateo County an alternative to driving would be to route SanTrans buses along Market Street instead of along Mission, · A BART/Amtrak transfer station in West Oakland would dramatically improve the rail connection between points along the I-80 Corridor, downtown Oakland and downtown San Francisco. By attracting I-80 users away from the freeway and onto a more efficient rail system, this connecting station would ease pressures on San Pablo Avenue, an important transit street, which gets inundated with I-80 overflow traffic every time the freeway gets stacked up, · Passenger rail service extended across a new Dumbarton Rail Bridge would provide a much needed and long-delayed second Bay rail crossing, · For almost 40 years there has been talk of creating a regional bus service to take people where the trains doesn’t go. The Region is still waiting for this service, · Large employers located in spread out employment “campuses” should sponsor free shuttle bus service to and from nearby transit nodes. There has been progress in this area; more is needed, · Buses and light rail vehicles crowded with patrons should operate on transit-only lanes, at least during the morning commute period, · Transit working rules must be formulated in a manner designed to foster consistently reliable transit service, · An independent operational and marketing analysis of the AC Transit system would bring about a major increase in AC Transit ridership, The above are typical of the type of change that is badly needed in the Bay Area. If public transit were rendered sufficiently reliable and appealing, it would cause motorists to leave their cars at home, at least some of the time. Sincerely yours, Gerald Cauthen, PE
Attachment: www.arb.ca.gov/lists/sb375-targets-ws/44-ltr_to_carb_july_0910.doc
Original File Name: Ltr to CARB July 0910.doc
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2010-07-27 07:34:16
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.