Comment Log Display

Comment Log Display

Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 58 for Design Comments for the GHG Scoping Plan (sp-design-ws) - 1st Workshop.


First Name: Mike
Last Name: Zucksworth
Email Address: lamike05@yahoo.com
Affiliation: Sierra Club

Subject: Supplemental Comment - Cap-and-Trade v Carbon Fees
Comment:
Dear CARB, I wanted to supplement my request for reconsideration of
using Carbon Fees, with the following request.

To date CARB has performed very limited public education on Carbon
Fees as an alternative market mechanism to create the incentives
necessary to transition to a post-fossil fuel economy.  I request
that CARB consider creating a committee to plan and conduct fair
and balanced public education on the choice between Cap-and-Trade
and CarbonFees.  

Following a period of public education on this choice, I request
that you conduct a period of additional public comment on this
choice. This is too important a question to go forward without
meaningful public education and involvement.  I believe that this
period of additional public education, involvement and public
comment can proceed during the next year, while other AB 32 early
actions are undertaken, and thus will not lead to a delay in the
emissions reductions mandated by AB 32.  As you may be aware
studies by both the Congressional Budget Office and the
Congressional Research Service have found that Carbon fees (also
referred to as Carbon Taxes)  would be an effective market
mechanism.  These studies have also noted significant problems
with the Cap-and-Trade approach. 

Attachment:

Original File Name:

Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-08-01 11:00:09



If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.


Board Comments Home

preload