|
BOC Gases
|
|
Low Temperature Oxidation System
|
|
CARB Grant Number ICAT 99-2
|
|
| The statements and conclusions in this Report are those of the grantee and not necessarily
those of the California Air Resources Board. The mention of commercial products, their source, or their use in
connection with material reported herein is not to be construed as actual or implied endorsement of such products. |
|
| Overview |
| BOC Gases has demonstrated it’s patented LoTOxTM technology for low temperature NOx removal at a reverbertory furnace used for lead
smelting, operated by Quemetco, Inc., City of Industry, California, a subsidiary of RSR Corporation.
The demonstration was funded in part by an Innovative Clean Air Technologies grant from the California Air
Resources Board. The demonstration was very successful, accomplishing > 90 percent NOx removal under
varying reverb furnace operating conditions, and the installation of a full scale system for control of NOx emissions
from the Quemetco, Inc., process is expected to be completed by the end of 2001. |
| LoTOxTM Process Description |
| The LoTOxTM
System is a NOx removal system that injects ozone into the flue gas stream to oxidize insoluble NOx to soluble oxidized
compounds. Ozone is produced on site and on demand by passing oxygen through an ozone generator. LoTOxTM is a low temperature system; therefore, it
does not require heat input to maintain operational efficiency or to prevent the "slip" of
treatment chemicals, such as ammonia, as is common with SCR and SNCR systems. |
| Ozone is produced in response to the amount of NOx present in the flue gas generated
by the process. The low operating temperature allows stable and consistent control regardless of variation
in flow, load or NOx content. There are no adverse effects of acid gases or particles on the LoTOxTM System, and some particles may even
enhance the reaction by producing sites for nucleation of moisture and by catalyzing the oxidation reaction. |
| Ozone rapidly reacts with insoluble NO and NO2 molecules to form soluble N2O5.
The species N2O5 is highly soluble and will rapidly
react with moisture in the gas stream to form nitric acid. The conversion of NOx into the aqueous phase
in the scrubber is rapid and irreversible, allowing nearly complete removal of NOx. The nitric acid,
along with unreacted N2O5 and nitrous acid formed by reaction of
NO2 with water, can be easily
scrubbed out of the gas stream in a wet scrubber with water or neutralized with a caustic solution. |
| The rapid reaction rate of ozone with NOx makes ozone highly selective for treatment
of NOx in the presence of other compounds such as CO and SOx, resulting in a high ozone utilization efficiency
for NOx removal with no wasteful consumption of ozone by CO and SOx. |
| The LoTOxTM
System can be installed as a stand-alone design or as a polishing system in compliment to combustion
modifications or other post-combustion technologies for NOx removal. Because the system is modular, it requires
minimal downtime to install and can be made to fit into limited space, with auxiliary components located
elsewhere on-site. The economic and environmental benefits of heat recovery are achieved readily because of the
LoTOxTM technology’s low
optimum operating temperature. Since the system efficiently removes more than 90 percent of the NOx downstream
of the combustion process, the operator can tune combustion components for stable burner operating conditions,
allowing more efficient combustion and lower CO emissions. This reduces fuel consumption and maintenance costs and
extends boiler / burner life. |
|
|
Figure 1 is an overall process diagram of the LoTOxTM System.
|
|
|
| The LoTOxTM
technology is based on the high solubility of higher-order nitrogen oxides in water. NO and NO2 are relatively insoluble in water as compared
to other oxides as shown in Table 1, where typical constituents in the combustion flue exhaust are listed. |
|
Table 1 - Relative Solubility of Various Gases in Water at 70ºF and 1
Atmosphere
|
Gas
|
Relative Solubility
|
|
Nitrogen, N2
|
1.0
|
|
Oxygen, O2
|
4.4
|
|
Nitric Oxide, NO
|
6.3
|
|
Nitrogen Dioxide, NO2
|
126
|
|
Carbon Dioxide, CO2
|
174
|
|
Sulfur Dioxide, SO2
|
11,700
|
|
| However, once the NOx is oxidized to higher orders of nitrogen oxides, their solubility
and reactivity with water increase significantly. The NOx oxidation step proceeds according to the following
reactions: |
|
NO + O3 à NO2
+ O2k298 = 1.8 x 10-14
(cm3/molecule*second)
|
|
NO2 + O3 à
NO3 + O2k298
= 3.2 x 10-17 (cm3/molecule*second)
|
|
NO2 + NO3
à N2 + O5k298
= 2.0 x 10-12 (cm3/molecule*second)
|
| These reactions are much faster than the ozone oxidation of CO to CO2 [k298 ~ 1.1 x 10-21
(cm3/molecule*second)] and of SO2 to SO3
[k298 = 2.2 x 10-22 (cm3/molecule*second)].
Thus ozone is highly selective for the oxidation of NOx relative to other combustion flue gas components.
Nitrogen pentoxide (N2O5) formed during the oxidation process reacts
vigorously with moisture in the gas stream to form nitric acid (HNO3). |
| Comparison of Post-Combustion NOx Abatement Technologies |
| Although there are other competing NOx technologies, SNCR and SCR remain the most
commonly used post combustion NOx abatement technologies. The LoTOxTM technology works quite differently from SCR and SNCR in the principal for NOx abatement;
i.e., while SNCR and SCR reduce NOx using ammonia and urea, LoTOTM technology uses ozone to selectively oxidize NOx. |
|
|
|
|
Reduction Using NH3 / Urea Oxidation Using O3/O2
|
|
(SCR, SNCR) (LoTOxTM)
|
|
|
| The technical and operating features of SNCR and SCR are compared to the LoTOxTM technology in Table 2. |
|
Table 2 - Comparison of Common Post
Combustion NOx Abatement
Technologies for NOx Emissions Control
|
| |
SNCR
|
SCR
|
LoTOxTM
|
|
Mode of Treatment
|
Reduction
|
Reduction
|
Oxidation
|
|
Active Chemical
|
NH3 / Urea
|
NH3 / Urea
|
Ozone
|
|
Gas Temperature
Required °F
|
1650 - 2000
|
500 - 900
|
150 – 250
|
|
Pressure Required,
psig
|
0+
|
0++
|
0+
|
|
Placement in
Exhaust System
|
Near Combustion
Chamber
|
Between Air Pre-Heater
and Economizer
|
Tail End
|
|
Catalyst Bed
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Gas Phase
Reaction Duct
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Scrubber
|
Optional
|
Optional
|
Yes
|
|
NOx Reduction
Achieved
|
40 - 70 Percent
|
60 - 95 Percent
|
90 - 98 Percent
|
|
Slip of Active Agent
|
NH3 – Yes
|
NH3- Yes
|
Ozone - No
|
|
CO Emissions After
Treatment
|
May Increase
|
May Increase
|
No Effect
|
|
SOx Emissions After
Treatment
|
Little Effect – Maybe
H2S
|
Little Effect - Maybe
H2S
|
No Effect or
Significantly Reduced
|
|
Gas Temperature
Outside Operating
Range - Overshoot
|
More NOx Emissions
Through NH3
Oxidation
|
More NOx Emissions
Through NH3 Oxidation,
Ammonia Slip
|
Increased O3
Consumption for
the Time Period
of Overshoot
|
|
Gas Temperature
Outside Operating
Range - Undershoot
|
More NOx Emissions
Through Reduced
Reduction by NH3
|
More NOx Emissions
Through Reduced
Reduction by NH3,
Ammonia Slip
|
No Effect
|
|
|
| One of LoTOxTM
System’s key advantages over technologies based on reduction is that the LoTOxTM System can conveniently handle multi-pollutants. Since SOx and particulate emissions
commonly accompany NOx emission, integrated scrubber systems can be implemented to remove NOx, SOx and particles
without significant additional costs. These features of the LoTOxTM system are shown in Table 3. |
|
Table 3 - NOx Emissions Control Technologies from Various Sources
–
LoTOxTM Allows
Multi-Pollutant Emissions Control
|
|
Emissions / Source Characteristics
|
SNCR
|
SCR
|
LoTOxTM
|
| Utility Boilers |
|
|
|
| Industrial Furnaces |
|
|
|
| FCC / Refining with NOx Only |
|
|
|
| Electric Arcs for Metals |
|
|
|
| Gas-Fired Glass Furnaces |
|
|
|
| Low Temperature Sources |
|
|
|
| Pickling / HNO3
Production |
|
|
|
| Battery Processing / Acid Recycling |
|
|
|
| Coal-Fired Utility Boilers with Mercury / NOx Emissions |
|
|
|
| Emissions with VOC’s and NOx |
|
|
|
| Emissions with Highly Variable NOx |
|
|
|
|
| Description of Testing |
| The testing at Quemetco, Inc., focused on measuring incoming NOx and flow variations,
varied ozone dosage, residence time and temperature data, and the impact of these variations on treatment
efficiency. The experimentation was conducted in manual operation mode to effect these parametric changes,
varying specific parametric settings and recording the results as part of the data acquisition system. The
residence time and treatment effectiveness test series provided valuable information for characterization of the
process gas stream. Information was tracked for ozone usage in relation to percentage of NOx removal, residual
O3 and temperature effects. |
|
Range of Gas Test Conditions
|
|
Gas Flow Range
|
150 to 300 scfm
|
|
Temperature Inlet
|
150 to 250 ºF
|
|
Inlet NOx
|
0 - 500 ppmvd
(Parts / Million by Volume, Dry Basis)
|
|
Inlet SOx
|
0 - 5000 ppmvd
|
|
Inlet O2
|
0 - 25 Volume Percent
|
|
Inlet CO
|
0 - 100 ppmvd
|
|
| Demonstration Test Results |
| There are three primary process variables which impact the NOx control capabilities
of LoTOxTM process: Temperature
of the flue gas (T), Residence Time of the flue gas in the reactor duct (RT) and Amount of Ozone (O3 Factors) injected into the reactor duct.
Based on the results of the LoTOxTM
demonstration testing, the most efficient control parameters for a full scale system on the Quemetco, Inc.,
furnace are a temperature of 175°F or less, a residence time of four seconds, and an ozone injection
factor of 80 to 90. The O3
Factor represents the O3 to
NOx ratio at the inlet to the reaction duct. The presented data uses O3 Factor for the sake of clarity and to provide meaningful data while maintaining confidentiality
of proprietary intellectual information. |
| Graph 1 depicts the performance conditions of the LoTOxTM process for the design conditions of RT = 4 seconds, T = 175°F and
O3 Factor = 70 to 90. Under
these design conditions the NOx removal achieved ranges from 80 percent at an O3 Factor of 70 to 95 percent at an O3 Factor of 90. |
|
|
Graph 1
|
|
|
| Summary |
| From the demonstration test data, it is clear that the LoTOxTM process is extremely effective and efficient at removing NOx from the Quemetco,
Inc., furnace flue gas. NOx removal efficiencies ranging from 80 percent to 95 percent were demonstrated as
achievable and controllable. When installed to treat the entire furnace exhaust (at 100 ppm NOx) the LoTOxTM System will reduce NOx emissions by up to
70 tons per year, depending on production schedule. The LoTOxTM System also allows the ability to tailor the NOx emissions to the source allowables, providing
market-sensitive NOx control. By injecting more or less ozone, the degree of NOx removal can be adjusted to optimize
the economic value of creating saleable NOx credits. Full scale systems include automated control systems which
automatically adjust the ozone injection rates in order to maintain a desired outlet NOx level, thereby enabling
the system to automatically respond to variations in the process conditions. The testing also demonstrated that
residual ozone levels can be maintained at undetectable levels despite variations in the process conditions, due
to the effectiveness of sulfite, which is formed as a by-product of Quemetco’s SOx removal system, as an ozone
scavenger. |
|
|
|
Funding Source
|
Funding Amount
|
|
|
|
ICAT
|
$199,790
|
|
Grantee
|
$555,540
|
|
|
|
Click here for the
entire final report.
|
|