|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Background:
|
|
|
|
|
Methods:
|
|
|
|
|
Results:
|
|
|
|
|
Significance and Application:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Projects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Air Resources Board's (ARB's) Indoor Air
Quality and Personal Exposure Assessment Program gathers information needed to estimate indoor exposures to air
pollutants and provides guidance to the public on steps they can take to reduce their exposures. Short-term exposures
to sufficient levels of two indoor pollutants, formaldehyde and toluene diisocyanate, can irritate sensitive tissues.
Long-term exposures may increase the risk of cancer. These compounds have been identified as toxic air contaminants
under ARB's air toxics program. In 1991, the ARB used available information to develop a public information guideline,
Formaldehyde
in the Home, which presents information
on common sources of formaldehyde in the home and steps people can take to reduce their exposures to formaldehyde.
This project was designed to provide up-to-date emission rate measurements from a cross section of common residential
products known or suspected to be indoor sources of formaldehyde or toluene diisocyanate.
Indoor levels of formaldehyde in California homes are typically several times higher than outdoor levels. Formaldehyde
is used in the manufacture of widely-used, diverse products such as particle board and permanent press fabrics.
Prior to this study, most of the comparative emission rate data were collected in the late 1970s/early 1980s and
do not reflect current product characteristics. Also, emissions from some potentially significant sources of formaldehyde
exposure, such as certain coatings and cosmetics, had not been measured earlier.
Toluene diisocyanate is used in the manufacture of polyurethane products, such as foam furniture cushions, foam
carpet pads, and various polyurethane coatings. Prior to this study, only very limited information was available
on toluene diisocyanate emissions from residential sources.
|
|
|
|
|
The investigators obtained product samples
of known or suspected indoor sources of formaldehyde or toluene diisocyanate primarily from retail and wholesale
outlets located in several California population centers. The investigators generally selected products with the
greatest likelihood of high emissions and/or high usage in residences.
Formaldehyde emissions were measured from 55 different products, over half of which were pressed wood products.
Samples of decorative laminates, permanent press fabrics, fiberglass insulation, interior latex paint, wood floor
finish, wallpaper, fingernail polish/hardeners, and wet-strength paper products also were included. Toluene diisocyanate
emissions were tested from 39 different polyurethane products, including foam carpet padding, foam furniture cushions,
varnishes, water sealers, caulking compounds, and adhesives.
Product emission rates were measured under controlled conditions using specialized chambers. Emission rates were
generally determined approximately 20 hours after each product was placed in the chamber. Emissions were alsomonitored
for the duration of each chamber test using a continuous monitor. Products were tested under two different temperatures
and air exchange rates chosen to represent conditions that might result in "typical" and "high level"
emissions.
Four other carbonyls were analyzed along with formaldehyde. These were the toxic air contaminants acetaldehyde,
propionaldehyde, methyl ethyl ketone, and methyl iso-butyl ketone. Because little was known about toluene diisocyanate
emissions, products expected to emit this gas were first screened in a small chamber in batches of similar products.
|
|
|
|
|
The highest formaldehyde emission rates were
measured from a wood floor finish, which emitted approximately 11,000 µg181g/m²/hr at the end of the
test period. Initial emission rates from that product were two orders of magnitude higher. Fingernail hardeners
also had rather high initial formaldehyde emissions. Of the "dry" products tested, bare pressed wood
products made with urea-formaldehyde resin generally had the highest emission rates, with most of the products
emitting at rates of approximately 100 to 300 µg181g/m²/hr. Wood products made with phenol-formaldehyde
resin, such as softwood plywood, generally had lower emissions than products made with urea-formaldehyde resin.
Laminates and other surface coat-ings acted as barriers to greatly reduce formaldehyde emissions from pressed wood
products. An exception was a formaldehyde-containing finish that added its own emissions to those of the cabinet
door to which it was applied.
Emission rates of new permanent press fabrics fell between those of the bare and coated pressed wood products.
Normal laundering reduced emissions from permanent press shirts by about 60 percent. The product category with
the lowest emissions was paper products, from which only small to negligible emissions were detected. Formaldehyde
emissions from selected products during typical use conditions are listed in Table 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formaldehyde Emissions from
Selected Indoor Sources
|
|
|
Typical Conditions (µg/m²/hr)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wet products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wood floor finish
|
|
|
|
|
fingernail hardener
|
|
|
|
|
latex paint
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wood products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cabinet door with acid-cured
finish
|
|
|
|
|
medium-density fiberboard cabinet
door
|
|
|
|
|
particle board
|
|
|
|
|
particle board with vinyl laminate
|
|
|
|
|
softwood plywood
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new permanent-press shirts
|
|
|
|
|
washed permanent-press shirts
|
|
|
|
|
fiberglass insulation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formaldehyde emission rates from wood products
made with urea-formaldehyde resin, including particle board, medium density fiberboard, and hardwood plywood, generally
appear to be lower than those reported in earlier studies. Emissions from wood products made with phenol-formaldehyde
resin were similar to the low levels reported in the past. Formaldehyde emissions from permanent press fabrics
appear to have decreased somewhat, while emissions from fiberglass products appear to be similar to earlier findings.
None of the residential products tested positive in the screening tests for toluene diisocyanate, suggesting that
indoor residential exposure to this pollutant is not a major concern. One non-residential product, a concrete sealer,
had high initial toluene diisocyanate emissions, with a rapid decline to low emissions within an hour after application.
|
|
|
|
|
This study updates our knowledge of the magnitude
of formaldehyde emissions from residential sources and also provides formaldehyde emissions data for some products
not previously tested. The results show that major residential sources of formaldehyde generally emit less formaldehyde
than those sources did in the past. They also indicate that some simple measures, such as putting laminates on
particle board or washing new permanent press fabrics, are effective in reducing formaldehyde emissions. This information
will aid ARB in providing guidance to the public on steps they can take to reduce their exposure to formaldehyde.
In addition, this was the first study to explore potential toluene diisocyanate emissions from a variety of residential
sources; the results allow us to reasonably conclude that indoor residential exposure to this pollutant is not
a major concern. Finally, the results of this study will be used to improve ARB's estimates of Californians' exposure
to formaldehyde and toluene diisocyanate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ARB has funded two related studies (ARB
contract numbers are in paren-theses). In Toxic
Volatile Organic Compounds in Environmental Tobacco Smoke
(A133-186) the investigators quantified the emissions of formaldehyde and 30 other pollutants in second-hand smoke
from the most popular cigarette brands in California. In Common
Indoor Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds: Emission Rates and Techniques for Reducing Consumer Exposures (95-302), the investigator is measuring the emissions
of a number of toxic air pollutants, including form-aldehyde and other aldehydes, from paints, carpet, and vinyl
flooring assemblies and is looking at simple ways to reduce those emissions.
|
|
|