Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment 1 for Amendments to On-Road Motorcycle Emission Standards and Test Procedures (onmc24) - 15-1.

First NameDoug
Last NameBroussard
Email Addressfourx5@gmail.com
AffiliationRider and user of California roads.
SubjectVanishing returns
Comment
As the CARB embraces EVs and continues to punish users of post-1976
classic cars and motorcycles, I find myself wondering whether this
rule along board is prepared to show the road user financial impact
for paying more to purchase a motorcycle that requires the
additional expense and weight of OBD equipment. 

Diminishing returns that require substantial expense, engineering
work, and visiting a Smog check center are not worth the taxpayer
expense.we all want cleaner air, and I support the initial mission
of the CARB, but over the past tenets years, I've watched the board
take punitive and performative actions that substantially damage
California Taxpayers and road users. Misinformation and expense are
the primary results for road users; requiring this additional
expense and road use simply to verify compliance is a bad idea for
all of us. 

Like the PUC, 

Attachment
Original File Name
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted 2024-10-22 11:14:00

If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.


Board Comments Home