First Name | Deborah |
---|---|
Last Name | Russell |
Email Address | deborahlr49@yahoo.com |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California |
Comment | Please auction off all emission credits. Program revenues should go toward GHG reduction programs, such as clean technologies, green jobs, and aid for low-income consumers and small businesses to reduce their energy bills. And please work to reduce the role of offsets in the Plan. Providing too many offsets encourages continuing emissions in low-income neighborhoods and in defenseless habitats, and weakens the demand for clean energy technology and jobs in California . - Big polluters should pay for all their emissions: 100% auction of emissions permits, no free giveaways. - Consider cap-and-trade just a minor tool among market mechanisms. Other tools should be brought forward more robustly, including feed-in tariffs and carbon fees in the Plan's near-term action agenda. - Make sure the 33-percent renewable electricity standard by 2020 is given the force of law, either through legislation or regulatory action. - Promote and enable Community Choice Electricity Aggregation (CCA) and its potentially powerful GHG reduction potential for cities and counties. - Give more specificity and amplitude to the goal of electrifying transportation, especially greatly expanding ZEV numbers (plug-ins and electric cars) beyond CARB's currently too low projected levels. - Greatly strengthen the too-modest land use and agricultural sections of Plan. The Plan greatly underestimates the significance of methane emissions, by using the 100-year global warming potential. Over a shorter time horizon, methane accounts for 17% to perhaps well over 30% of the state's GHGs, rather than the 5.7% in the 2004 inventory. - Further increase requirements for zero waste and recycling, as well as Extended Producer Responsibility. - Ensure that actions to reduce greenhouse gases also help, whenever possible, to clean up California 's unhealthy air. - Limiting offsets will strengthen the demand for clean energy innovation, which in turn provides more good jobs for Californians. - Any offsets allowed should at most represent only a small portion of a polluter's required emission reductions. They should have stringent protocols ensuring that the reductions are quantifiable, new, permanent, subject to independent third-party verification, enforceable by CARB, and only located in California . - Offsets from sinks, such as planting trees or avoiding tree cut-downs, should not be allowed, since they are too difficult to measure and often under-perform. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2008-11-17 17:24:20 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.