| Comment | Ladies and gentlemen,
There is no good reason to destroy an industry when you have the
alternative in rule 1469. I have already switched to Trivalent
Chromium for my processes but it took years and hundreds of
thousands of dollars. It does work in my case but anyone doing
custom restoration work cannot use it. Since our industry
contributes far less than 1 % of the emissions in California this
rule makes no sense. I think you are kowtowing to the environmental
coalitions for no good reason other than it is politically correct.
Please do the right thing and change this from a ban to a rule that
mirrors Southern Cal rule 1469. Don't kill off this vital industry
for no good reason.
|
|---|