Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment 1 for Proposed Advanced Clean Cars II Regulations (accii2022) - 15-2.

First NameJamie
Last NameDow
Email Addressjamiedow@gmail.com
Affiliation
SubjectCalifornia must not be a laggard on clean cars
Comment

Hi, I'm a lifelong California resident, EV journalist and I've had asthma my whole life like the 2 million kids who get it every year globally from traffic pollution - and whose lifetime of health costs are not paid by those polluters.

 

Automakers say it will be hard to reach the 2035 target.  They've made excuses, and have touted their insufficient actions to fight climate change.  They've questioned this regulation from every angle to slow down implementation because "this will be too hard, we can't do it fast enough."

 

But, none of this matters.  In this negotiation, the automakers' adversary is not CARB, California voters, or the courts.  Their adversary is physics.  And physics does not care about your mundane complaints, it only cares how much carbon is in the atmosphere.

 

A study just came out which shows we can stop climate change with immediate action.  But even if we lower emissions to zero TODAY - not in 2035, or 2050 - we have a chance to go over 1.5ºC of warming, which is a target we should not exceed and we must lower that chance.

 

So, again, in the face of physics, which does not negotiate, nothing the automakers have said matters at all.  We must stop emissions not just as fast as possible, but faster than these automakers claim is possible.  They have to pick up the pace and if they can't, then try harder. All hands on deck, figure it out or go bankrupt, and why not also pay for all the pollution you've caused in the last century by the way?

 

The 2035 requirement is not enough.  California shouldn't be selling gasoline today, much less 20, 30 years in the future, as 2034 gas cars will still pollute for decades down the road.  And California, with our US and global leadership, can make automakers pick up the pace by choosing a stronger target than ACC2.

 

I call on the board to implement a stronger regulation, pulling forward targets to 100% all-EV by 2030 or even earlier, and further work to reduce car usage in general and shift people from cars to cleaner transport methods.  This is what Norway is doing, which is nearing its 2025 EV-only sales requirement already in 2022, and the biggest auto company in the world by market cap has been all EV since 2008.  So these targets can be met, and California shouldn't be a global laggard on this issue.


Attachment
Original File Name
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted 2022-08-08 20:13:08

If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.


Board Comments Home