Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment 92 for Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation (acf2022) - 45 Day.

First NameAnonymous
Last NameAnonymous
Email Addressheavylizard@yahoo.com
AffiliationCA State Fleet
SubjectACF Support and Concerns
Comment

My agency is one of the "Big 8" State Government Fleets in California.  My agency fully supports the transition to ZEV fleets, but we must proceed in a way that will not overburdon taxpayers with higher taxes.

First we ask CARB to consider the short and long term plans (or lack of plans) for ample power generation.  If there are plans in place to create more green energy plants (solar, wind, geothermal, hydroelectric, tidal or nuclear) we recommend taking a pause to seek electrical engineering experts to determine if the power needs this regulation will generate will be met as these plants come online.  If there are no plans for more power generation, CARB should pause the regulation until a sustaianable power generation plan is adopted.

Second, we ask CARB to consider the extreme cost for the installation of EVSE infrastucture.  My agency estimates these costs at about $40 Million.  We operate in the most remote locations of the state where planned private, state and federal EVSE projects are not currently prioritized.  While we may be successful in obtaining some funding through a Budget Change Proposal to install ample EVSE at our sites, it is unlikely we will be able to have all needed EVSE in place before the regulation as written hits.

Third, we ask CARB to consider the price point of these medium and heavy duty assets.  While formed Governor Brown indicated in his Executive Order B-16-2012 for light duty: "The costs of zero-emission vehicles will be competitive with conventional combustion vehicles; and".  This has not been the case in 2012 and is definitely still not the case in 2022.  EV trucks are expected to be twice as much or more likely triple the price of ICE trucks.  My agency can barely afford to replace its ICE fleet at current market rate, let alone 2 or 3 times more for EV versions with less range and utility.  We ask CARB to include exemptions when the cost of a ZEV is 10% or more than the ICE equivalent.

Fourth, we ask CARB to consider the slow emergence of the market availablity of certain classes of vehicles subject to the regulations.  Currently there are no or few offering on the market for 3/4 ton pickups on up to larger 33,000+ GVWR trucks.  Year-by-year exemptions need to be added to the regulation if the truck you are buying either a) is not avaiable on the market or b) is not avaiable in the needed configuration (including range) to meet the business needs.

In closing, again we support the transition to ZEV, but the full adoption needs to 1) not crash the CA energy grid; 2) allow for the supporting EVSE to be installed within reason; 3) not be an exorbinate cost to taxpayers by more than doubling fleet replacement costs; 4) allow for certain year-by-year exemptions when needed assets are not on the market or not avaiable in the needed configurations.

Thank You


Attachment
Original File Name
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted 2022-10-12 10:08:29

If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.


Board Comments Home