Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment 96 for Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation (acf2022) - 45 Day.

First NameJohn
Last NameDoe
Email Addressmtboll1998@gmail.com
AffiliationCA State Fleet
SubjectACF Support and Concerns
Comment

My agency is one of the "Big 8" State Government Fleets in

California.  My agency fully supports the transition to ZEV

fleets, but we must proceed in a way that will not overburdon

taxpayers.

 

First we ask CARB to consider the short and long term plans (or

lack of plans) for ample power generation.  If there are plans

in place to create more green energy plants (solar, wind,

geothermal, hydroelectric, tidal or nuclear) we recommend taking a

pause to seek electrical engineering experts to determine if the

power needs this regulation will generate will be met as these

plants come online.  If there are no plans for more power

generation, CARB should pause the regulation until a sustainable

power generation plan is adopted.

 

Second, we ask CARB to consider the extreme cost for the

installation of EVSE infrastucture.  My agency estimates these

costs at about $40 Million.  We operate in the most remote

locations of the state where planned private, state and federal

EVSE projects are not currently prioritized.  While we may be

successful in obtaining some funding through a Budget Change

Proposal to install ample EVSE at our sites, it is unlikely we will

be able to have all needed EVSE in place before the regulation as

written hits.

 

Third, we ask CARB to consider the price point of these medium

and heavy duty assets.  While former Governor Brown indicated

in his Executive Order B-16-2012 for light duty: "The costs of

zero-emission vehicles will be competitive with conventional

combustion vehicles; and".  This has not been the case in 2012

and is definitely still not the case in 2022.  EV trucks are

expected to be twice as much or more likely triple the price of ICE

trucks.  My agency can barely afford to replace its ICE fleet

at current market rate, let alone 2 or 3 times more for EV versions

with less range and utility.  We ask CARB to include

exemptions when the cost of a ZEV is 10% or more than the ICE

equivalent.

 

Fourth, we ask CARB to consider the slow emergence of the

market availability of certain classes of vehicles subject to the

regulations.  Currently there are no or few offering on the

market for 3/4 ton pickups on up to larger 33,000+ GVWR

trucks.  Year-by-year exemptions need to be added to the

regulation if the truck you are buying either a) is not available on

the market or b) is not available in the needed configuration

(including range) to meet the business needs.

 

In closing, again we support the transition to ZEV, but the full

adoption needs to 1) not crash the CA energy grid; 2) allow for the

supporting EVSE to be installed within reason; 3) not be an

exorbinate cost to taxpayers by more than doubling fleet

replacement costs; 4) allow for certain year-by-year exemptions

when needed assets are not on the market or not available in the

needed configurations.

 

Thank You


Attachment
Original File Name
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted 2022-10-12 11:29:11

If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.


Board Comments Home