First Name | Larry |
---|---|
Last Name | Rennacker |
Email Address | LarryR@Arrow-tek.com |
Affiliation | ArrowTek |
Subject | ACF Regulation - Why the Renewable Diesel Hate? |
Comment | There are some critical issues the State of California must address before going down the ACF road as proposed. It is baffling, if not stunning, why renewable diesel was not presented as an ACF option for diesel vehicles. ARB says the primary driver for the ACF regulation is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and, for that reason, is mandating diesel vehicles be replaced with ZEVs. ZEV means grid power and right now ~40% of the grid power comes from natural gas fired power plants, and that fraction goes way up when demand it at its highest. But renewable diesel is by definition 100% carbon neutral. If the objective is to reduced greenhouse gases as fast as possible why on earth exclude renewable diesel as an option to ZEVs? Moreover, putting all your energy supply eggs in one basket (grid power) is a strategic folly. The grid goes down and then what? No transportation system? Allowing renewable diesel diversifies the transportation system making it more robust and less vulnerable to disruption. I realize ARB has secondary reasons for pushing this regulation: reducing ambient PM 2.5 and ozone. This seems like a stretch. ARB is attacking these two with a slew of other regulations, including amendments to the mobile Off-Road Regulation and the recently adopted, yet to be enforced Heavy-Duty Vehicle inspection and maintenance program, to name a few. But even assuming PM reductions are essential to this regulation (they are not) PM emissions from diesel engines are lower than PM emissions from gas fired power plants. ARB/EPA emission certification tests for diesel engines show either extremely low (0.002 grams/kWhr) or undetectable PM emissions. Compare that with emissions from natural gas fired power plants at 0.017 grams/kWhr (Argonne National Labs, ANL-20/41, August 2020). Finally, ARB saying the ACF will reduce NOx and hence ozone. This one is odd because no areas of the state rely on this regulation to meet federal ambient ozone standards. That is, these regions have approved air quality improvement plans to meet federal standards that do include nor rely on the ACF. So, to sum up. If the goal really is first and foremost to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as fast as possible while supporting a robust transportation system, and while not compromising other air quality goals, it seems like common sense to include renewable diesel as a compliance option for diesel vehicles. For the record I have no vested interest in renewable diesel. Regards, Larry Rennacker ArrowTek |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2023-04-07 10:51:01 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.