First Name | Phillip |
---|---|
Last Name | Jones |
Email Address | jonesp1@cox.net |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Proposed Amendments to the Commercial Harbor Craft Regulation |
Comment | Dear Board Chair: With regard to the subject proposed regulation, we believe the intent of the regulation is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing and future marine craft. While to many this may be a worthwhile and lofty goal to "do their part" in reducing atmospheric CO2, the risk versus reward does not appear to justify the action. The emission produced by the marine craft fleet, especially the small recreational and commercial craft fleet is but a mere fraction (drop in the bucket) of total greenhouse emission produced by all other forms of transportation in California. The consequences of these regulations will be punitive not only to commercial businesses, their employees, and supporting business services dependent upon commercial harbor craft, but also to all those that utilize such services including poor and under served communities. Many commercial craft that are involved in recreational fishing for example provide recreational opportunities for poor and under served communities, especially children. Many sportboat operators provide charity charters for inner-city youth to give them a once in a lifetime opportunity to fish, whale watch, or conduct marine science aboard a recreational-commercial vessel (RV). Enacting regulations that impose requirements that will essentially put them out of business for negligible environmental benefits is illogical if not unjust. The state of the science and industry for propulsion replacement from gas or diesel to all electric is just not their. The range of such craft is a fraction of what a diesel engine can produce. The battery cell size needed would likely take up the vast capacity of the craft to make it practical, thus making it impractical. The regulations proposed may be considered a step in the right direction with regard to reducing C02 emissions, however, now is not the time. We need to let the "state of the science" catch up with the proposed regulation. Putting thousands of people out of work and killing a multibillion dollar part of our economy for negligible environmental benefits is not in the best interests of California. Thank you for your consideration. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2021-10-19 14:55:51 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.