First Name | Jason |
---|---|
Last Name | Zenor |
Email Address | Pridecharters@gmail.com |
Affiliation | CFPV owner |
Subject | 11/19/ 21 CARB proposal on TIER 4 engine for CFPVs |
Comment | As a small business owner I am urging CARB to consider accepting SACs proposed compromise on TIER 4 engines. While I do agree and support CARBs mission of improving air quality, this uncompromising approach of requiring TIER 4 engines on CFPVs for the following reasons. 1. TIER 4 engines are unavailable for my size boat. There is not a TIER 4 engine in existence that will fit inside a vessel of my size. CARB acknowledges this, yet still is proposing that we be required to put a piece of technology that doesn't exist in our vessels 2. TIER 4 engines that do exist in other capacities are extremely dangerous. These engines produce exhaust gases in excess of 1500 degrees. The fire hazards are extremely high. We have seen the consequences of a fire on a small wooden boat with the recent conception tragedy. If TIER 4 engines are implemented risk of tragedies like the Conception will increase dramatically. In addition the menus one control technology is very unreliable. This isn't acceptable 100 miles out at sea. There are times where my passengers and crews lives are relying on our propulsion to keep us safe. If CARB does implement this rules the board members will have to live with themselves if a tragedy is related to the use of this TIER 4 technology. Business owners faced with the prospect of losing their livelihoods in an effort to comply will put this dangerous technology on their boat. 3. Perhaps the most important and overriding factor as to why people like me are objecting CARBs proposal is the cost . For myself and at least 3/4s of my colleagues the cost of implementation is many times greater then what my business is worth. My vessel of wood and fiberglass construction simply will not be able to handle the extremely hot exhaust gases of a TIER 4 engine without being a fire hazard. The cost of replacing my boat with a new one will be in excess of 2 million dollars and take 2-4 years. That is if I can find a boat yard that is able to build my vessel. 4. Most CFPVs spend less then 20% of their time in state waters. I cannot Understand why CARB is willing to put small business owner out of business while hundred of commercial ships that do not comply with TIER 4 spend days anchored up in state waters producing hundreds or thousands of times of pollutants then a CFPV. If CARB was actually concerned with cleaning the air they would focus on alleviating congestion at our ports. As an alternative to blanket requirements of TIER 4 engines I would like to propose a smart time line of requiring vessels to be fitted with TIER 3 engines. TIER 3 engines are readily available, proven, reliable and safe to use in our vessels. In addition to fitting into our vessels without modification, they are clean. A TIER 3 engine produces about 1/5th the NOX and carbon monoxide of an older pre tier engine. TIER 3 engines are far less polluting then the class of engines on foreign commercial ships that regularly dock in our California ports. This alternative would allow the multi billion dollar Sportfishing business that provides thousands of jobs to stay in business and would allow business owners such as myself to not lose their livelihoods and life's work. Sincerely, Jason Zenor Owner/ Operator MV Pride |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2021-11-07 19:43:31 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.