Comment Log Display

Dear CARB,

I am both a recreational fisherman and a supporter of
sustainability. In fact, I used to be the Director of Marketing for
the California Center for Sustainable Energy (aka CSE), a large NGO
that promotes and sponsors green energy and renewables. HOWEVER,
what is being proposed under the Commercial Harbor Craft
regulations goes WAY beyond anything I've ever come across in my 20
years of monitoring rule making. 

It's like using multiple sledge hammers to kill an ant. Not only is
the technology virtually unobtainable and extraordinarily
expensive, it has the potential to scrap wooden and fiberglass
vessels removing hundreds if not thousands of working boats from
service.

Off-shore recreational fishing is largely a working class sport.
While a few boats may cater to the wealthy, the vast majority of
participants are ordinary folks who pay $50 to go on half-day trips
or $250 to go on overnight trips with their friends and families.
These "party" boats serve up to 50 anglers at a time.

Should your new rules go into effect, it would literally triple to
quadruple the price of trips or simply cause operators to stop
altogether in California while scrapping perfectly good craft.

How does this serve the public in any way? Sportfishing is NOT a
major source of air pollution -- especially since many trips only
leave from a California harbor and travel well beyond the 3 mile
state limits and 12 mile US limits. 

Again, unless you deliberately want to put sportfishing out of
business, please reconsider your actions.