First Name | Gregory |
---|---|
Last Name | Grivetto |
Email Address | greggrivetto@icloud.com |
Affiliation | Former excursion boat owner |
Subject | CHC2021 Save Our Boats |
Comment | To Whom It May Concern, I write this as a former excursion vessel owner/operator that understands the financial hardships associated with remaining in this industry. Most of the businesses to be affected are family owned small businesses. There are few that will be able to absorb the cost of substantial modification of existing vessel or construction of a new vessel to meet the letter of CHC2021. To give you additional context with which to understand my position, I am an environmental advocate that fully understands the immediate necessity to move toward carbon neutrality or negativity by substantial reduction in GHG emissions across the board. Every little piece of the puzzle is a piece to be addressed, some can be heavy handed while others need to be on a case by case. CHC2021 should be looked at as one of the examples of case by case. My immediate concerns are the small business sportfishing and excursion vessels that service the Southern California region, but my comments are generally aimed at all small ocean based businesses CHC2021 will affect. As you are aware, marinized Tier 4 diesel engines are not available for most of the vessels blanketed by CHC2021. And if the technology does become available, in the format that is anticipated, 75% of the existing small business sportfishing and excursion vessels will not be able to make modifications required to install these engines. The United States Coast Guard has also expressed concern in this arena. If it is the intent to "Darwin" businesses out of existence to reduce GHG, this initiative will do the trick, but there will be substantial lash back from many directions. As previously stated, I am an environmental advocate. My views are more moderate when addressing comparatively small quantity GHG producers. A multi-tiered approach, utilizing engine replacement with existing technology that will be better than the current Tier 2 engines utilized in these vessels coupled with modifications to operations to include some of what is already in CHC2021: 1) Utilization of shore power immediately upon return to berth UNLESS the vessel will be underway within a pre-determined timeframe. 2) Main engine idleing reduction - When not required, main engines must be secured within a certain timeframe, i.e. 2 mins, 3 mins, 5 mins, etc. 3) Engine maintenance - Engines must be maintained per OEM recommended intervals for oil/filter changes, air filter changes, engine adjustments, etc. Documentation of said maintenance to be electronically provided to CARB at time of maintenance. Yes, this is a huge work load, but will keep owners honest. 4) SMOG Program - Development of a SMOG program that tests engines on each vessel every 1 to 2 years to ensure they fall within CARB guidelines. Similar to tests performed on motor vehicles. Currently a program of this nature for CHC does not exist. Once again, huge workload, but will keep owners honest. New Technology Exploration: Work with small business CHC and marine PE's to develop usable technology for these vessels to reduce GHG emissions while satisfying safety requirements set forth by USCG and accompanying CFR's. The following are examples, though presently are not feasible or practical now in a commercial small passenger vessel, but with development for the maritime industry this is/will be the future: 1)Installation of batteries, solar panels to allow for reduced electrical load and GHG emissions. 2) Survey of vessels to determine ways to reduce power consumption while maintaining safety and comfort for passengers/crew. 3) Nitrogen fuel cell technology 4) Open door discussions to slowly swing the paradigm. Most small business owners have a very small margin. If you were to work as a partner to the future instead of Thor's Hammer, threatening to smash small business, the response would be much better. Conclusion: We all understand that GHG is the problem. Look at the large scale polluters i.e. ships anchored offshore, large commercial - high hour operations, etc. But still, there must be a guiding hand and a paradigm shift. Thank you, Gregory Grivetto 619-843-4256 |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2021-10-05 15:14:47 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.