Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment 51 for Proposed Amendments to the ATCM for Chromium Electroplating and Chromic Acid Anodizing Operations (chromeatcm2023) - 45 Day.

First NameCathy
Last NameAtterman
Email Addressla_design@sbcglobal.net
Affiliation
SubjectCARB
Comment
We have been in the promotional marketing industry as a supplier
and manufacturer for more than 25 yrs. We have made plenty of
jewelry and other small promotional items doing business with
General/Brite Plating in LA County.
The amount of Chrome/Hexavalent Chrome use on these products does
not represent enough of a percentage to cause any harm airborne or
in contact to skin to warrant a ban. There have been enough props
and other guidelines placed in this industry that are being
followed to protect the people.  I have never had a complaint from
a client regarding this type of plating. There are very few plating
companies left for manufacturers to source out for plating
processes, please don't take away more jobs and more small
business.  There are other more important airborne causing illness
like aircraft fuel, diesel fuel to name a couple.  

Attachment
Original File Name
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted 2023-01-16 15:29:35

If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.


Board Comments Home