First Name | Jim |
---|---|
Last Name | Meyer |
Email Address | jmeyer@aviation-repair.com |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Local vs Statewide |
Comment | According to the health risk data published with this rule proposal, proximity is a major factor in risk. The EJ's say there are local problems in some Southern California communities. They are asking for solutions. CARB's proposal completely misses the local nature of the stated problems and imposes a non-local statewide rule and a statewide ban. Make the whole class stay in for recess when Jeff doesn't get his homework done. This is completely opposite the intent of AB 617 which asks CARB to place emphasis on the needs of local communities. I don't get it. There is no relief from the ban granted to platers in communities with no residents. There is no relief granted to platers who are not near schools. It is especially curious that there is no provision to allow new permits in areas away from EJ communities and residents so that the platers the EJ community wants out, would have an in-state alternative place to go. A win-win. CARB is not providing a reasonable method for well-intentioned, law-abiding businesses to exist. Why? |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2023-01-17 19:35:24 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.