First Name | Manuel |
---|---|
Last Name | Silva |
Email Address | manny.silva@husa.com |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Source test requirements when not using NO2 defaults |
Comment | The requirement that states if you choose to use your own N20 from your source test,instead of the default,then you must source test annually,is very unfair for the following reasons 1.Local air districts like the SJVAPCD already have N20 limits that have to be proven by source testing already.The default for N20 in this case should be what you have to make in that district.In this district the Nox ppm limit is already set at 9ppm.So the default for N20 should be set at what the highest limit is in that district. 2.Saying that if you choose your District's limit,that you must then subject your self to annual source testing is going to cost more,the reason being that in this district if you make the limits two years in a row then you can go 36 months before having to test again. 3.What is the purpose of the local air district if you are basically saying we will not accept what your district has mandated,and we don't trust your source test data that you paid for. 4.Source testing boilers is not cheap,and to require more,when you already have documented results that were approved by the district is beyond me 5.Also using a default for N20 or Nox is basically telling industry that all that money you spent on Nox control to get to 9ppm,is null and void unless you submit to the States annual source testing program. 6.Bottom line is don't the State have any confidence in the local air districts?and if not then do away with them and just have one agency to report to. I have attached the section of this bill I'm talking about below.So all interested parties can read into it,maybe I'm misinterpeting this but using the default N20 has got to give you a higher total,than what you'd get using 9ppm district imposed limit that is already in place. Copied from the lastest version of the GHG reporting req The operator may elect to calculate CH4 and N2O emissions using ARB approved source specific emission factors derived from source tests conducted at least annually under the supervision of ARB or the local air pollution control district or air quality management district. Upon approval of a source test plan by ARB, the source test procedures in that plan shall be repeated in future years to update the source specific emission factors A-84 annually. In the absence of source specific emission factors approved by ARB, the operator shall use the default emission factors provided in Appendix A. (c) Method for Calculating CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion Using |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2008-05-30 16:26:40 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.