First Name | Mahesh |
---|---|
Last Name | Talwar |
Email Address | oceanair1@att.net |
Affiliation | OceanAir Environmental, LLC |
Subject | Rail Agreement |
Comment | 1. It is common practice for the major railroads to lease the locomotives from third party leasing companies. There may be more than 200 leased locomotives that are operated by BN and UP in California that do not bear their name on the locomotives. It is not clear if they are covered by this agreement 2. All the efforts that are part of the agreement bring only 20% reduction in PM. Even this 20% reduction is not a real number as most of the locomotives have already been equipped with idle reduction technology, or were already committed to installing them prior to the agreement. This agreement therefore creates not much new effort other than a huge regulatory system of monitoring, paper work, training, more administrative work. A lot of money it seems like will be spent on government personnel monitoring this porogram 3. The program as outlined is too weak and delivers very little public benefit at great adminstrative cost to both private and government. 4. Why not adopt South Coast AQMD's MOU Statewide and force all locomotives to comply with Tier II with early banking and credits as incentives. This will give 50% PM benefits, 60% NOx benefits. There are already technological developments in place to provide Tier II retrofit kits In light of the above, we urge the Board to reject the agreement on the basis that it provides very little public benefits at great adminstrative burden. It is also based on misguided science, i.e. smoke and particulates are equivalent. I can understnad a lay man saying this, but I have trouble seeing this inference in a regulatory document. Let me simply say that smoke and particulate matter are not equivalent. In closing, we simply state that this agreement is based on too lenient measures, provides very little public benefit, is too beauracratic in nature, and most of it is based on what the railroads are doing anyway. CARB has not presented what it is going to cost in CARB staff time and expense to implement and montor this program. We must have the whole financial picture. |
Attachment | |
Original File Name | |
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted | 2006-01-23 08:34:24 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594.