Comment Log Display

Hi Nicole and Lezlie --

We have a quick initial comment for the Table 2 in the staff
report, which summarizes the quantitative results for different
strategy types in terms of their effects of reducing GHG emissions
beyond the current SCS.

As you know, our current SCS is wrapping up, so for our stress test
memo to ARB from March 6 of this year
(https://mtcdrive.app.box.com/file/143895568603), we used our Big
Cities Scenario, which included more aggressive Land Use and
Transit policies compared to the current plan.  In that memo, we
also discussed testing pricing and the effects of a per mile VMT
fee.

Based on this, we think a couple of values are omitted from Table 2
in the staff report, and we request they be included as follows.
(The table footnotes are just for your info and our notes.)

Since this table is replicated in Slide 10 in the workshop slide
deck, would it be possible to make this updates to the slides
before tomorrow’s workshop at MTC?
(https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/sb375_workshop_presentation_san_francisco.pdf)

Thank you!
-Lisa