Comment Log Display

[corrected text] The US Supreme Court now requires the EPA to
conduct cost-benefits of its regulations.  California now needs to
comply with that ruling and publish exactly what benefits its
climate change regulations will produce - including EXACT reduction
of global temperatures, sea levels, hospital admissions, extreme
weather events and all the other global warming claims as well as
the costs imposed on each citizen and business.  This will require
publishing the EXACT relationship between GHG emissions and global
temperatures which has yet to be done - which will reveal that
California emissions reductions will not have a significant effect
on global temperatures and the other effects and therefore the
costs will be EXCESSIVE.  It should then change focus
to concentrate on reducing traffic congestion by application of
latest technologies, reducing the urban heat island effect and
limiting the health maleffects of unburned hydrocarbons, NOx and
SO2 diesel emissions by applying new clean diesel regulations to
genuinely improve the environment.