Comment Log Display

I've studied climate science to a level of detail that few can
comprehend and I can say with absolute certainty that the IPCC and
its self serving consensus over estimates the effect of incremental
CO2 by at least a factor of 3 to 4.  If you pursue the path of
regulating CO2 for the purpose of mitigating climate change, you
will be a party to the stupidest thing ever done in the name of
science.  Climate science has been horribly corrupted since the
inception of the IPCC, who needs a significant anthropogenic effect
to justify their existence, yet has become the arbiter of what is
and what is not climate science by virtue of what they publish in
their reports.  This conflict of interest is intolerable and as it
has morphed into a political dividing point, it's reached the point
of insanity.  I urge you to pay attention to the actual science and
stop this politically motivated war against CO2, whose only
measurable effect has been the greening of the planet.  I will
predict with absolute certainty that mankind's biggest problem,
once we actually do run out of oil, will be how do we enrich
atmospheric CO2 to keep agriculture from crashing.
Regards,
George White