Comment Log Display

I UNDERSTAND THE INTENT AND SPIRIT OF THE PROPOSAL, BUT I HAVE
CONCERNS.THE CUSTOMER SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS OR HER OWN
ACTIONS, LETS NOT GET THAT WRONG. I CAN SEE THIS COULD BE A CAN OF
WORMS AND PUT THE BLAME WHERE IT SHOULD NOT BE. IF A CUSTOMER ASKS
A SHOP FOR A TIRE PRESSURE CHECK OK BUT LETS SAY THAT HE HAD LOW
PRESSURE, YOU ADD AND RECORD THAT, WHICH IS MORE WORK,AND LETS SAY
THEY WERE LOW JUST 15% AND THEY DROVE THAT WAY FOR A WHILE AND THEN
YOU ADD AIR AND THEN THE TIRE SEPERATES AND SOMEONE GETS HURT OR
KILLED, I CAN SEE US GETTING BLAMED. THATS NOT RIGHT OR MORAL. THE
ONLY OWNS WHO WILL BENIFIT WILL BE THE LAWYERS AND OTHERS IN THE
JUSDICIAL SYSTEM WHOM GET PAID.WE TELL PEOPLE ALL THE TIME THAT
THERE TIRES ARE LOW, OR BAD AND THEY MAKE DECISIONS AND LIVE WITH
THEM.
BESIDES ALL THE NEW CARS ARE BEING MADE WITH TIRE PRESSURE
MONITORS.
DON'T DO THIS. IT WOULD BE A MISTAKE.
SINCERELY MARK BEAULIEU
OWNER OF AN AUTO REPAIR SHOP.
AND A CONSUMER