Comment Log Display

Comment Log Display

Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 19 for Design Comments for the GHG Scoping Plan (sp-design-ws) - 1st Workshop.


First Name: Ken
Last Name: Johnson
Email Address: [email protected]
Affiliation:

Subject: Carbon Fee
Comment:
CARB is evaluating carbon fees as an alternative to cap-and-trade,
but disfavors carbon fees on the grounds that "they provide less
certainty in California�s ability to meet specific emission
targets, as required under AB 32" (Draft Plan, page 42). However,
carbon fees and cap-and-trade are neither mutually exclusive nor
incompatible policy options. A carbon fee would provide greater
certainty of meeting California�s AB 32 goal, and could
incentivize early action in advance of post-2020 regulations, if
it is implemented as a price floor in the context of cap-and-trade
(i.e., as a reservation price in an allowance auction).
...

Attachment: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/BARCU/barcu-attach-old/sp-design-ws/21-kenjohnson_2008_07_22.pdf

Original File Name: KenJohnson_2008_07_22.pdf

Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-07-22 21:19:17



If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.


Board Comments Home

preload