Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 159 for Informal Public Comments on the Proposed Advanced Clean Fleets Rulemaking (acf-comments-ws) - 1st Workshop.
First Name: Gary
Last Name: Arant
Email Address: garant@vcmwd.org
Affiliation: Valley Center Municipal Water District
Subject: Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation - Commercial Availability
Comment:
July 20, 2022 To: California Air Resources Board From: Gary Arant, General Manager, Valley Center Municipal Water District Subject: All Clean Fleets Rule - Commercial Availability of EVs Dear CARB Commissioners and Staff, Among retail water agencies, there have been ongoing discussions regarding a critical aspect of a successful implementation of this important regulation. In addition to concerns about a very short time frame for implementation, including the timely installation of required on-site charging infrastructure issue, much attention has been focused on the topic of "Commercial Availability" of suitable Vocational EVs (vehicles water and wastewater utilities will use) and how that will be defined in the final regulation. In our view, there are many important aspects to the term "Commercial Availability". Available, but in What Quantities? 1. Vocational EVs may be commercially available but are they available in sufficient quantities to create a competitive bidding environment for public agencies? Not only should CARB monitor what EVs are commercially available, but also in what quantities are the EVs available to meet the needs of literally hundreds of water, wastewater, and electric utilities to provide a competitive bidding market. Available but at What Price? 2. In light of regulatory pressure placed on water and wastewater utilities to maintain water and wastewater service affordability, especially to disadvantaged and underserved communities, how much more should a public water/wastewater/ electric utility be required to pay for an EV compared to comparable ICV....30%, 50%, 75%, 100? CARB ACF regulations need to establish a cost premium cap of 30% beyond which the utility has the option to purchase an ICV. Available, but what kind of Market? 3. Without items 1 and 2 above, the ACF Regulation is creating a market that requires utilities to purchase Vocational EVs without determining if sufficient quantities exist to create a competitive market and at what cost premium cap. As such, a distorted market emerges where conditions are ripe for unfair pricing (gouging) by EV manufacturers and retailers. Without mechanisms in place to determine when sufficient numbers of a particular EV are available to create a bid competitive market and has not set a cost premium cap, then it will need to monitor and regulate the marketing and sales practices of EV manufacturers and retailers. Available, but When? 4. An important component of Commercial Availability is when can the EV be delivered. 3 to 6 months is reasonable and customary, but not 1 to 2-year estimates of which we are aware. The ability of a utility to function and respond is necessarily tied to the possession of critical and specialized equipment. CARB needs to set a parameter for EV availability with a delivery timeline not to exceed 6 months and if the quoted delivery time exceeds 6 months, the utility should have the option to reject the bid and purchase a comparable ICV. In Conclusion These provisions will incentivize EV manufacturers and retailers to produce Vocational EVs in sufficient quantities to facilitate a competitive bidding environment for vehicles priced reasonably comparable to ICV prices and with acceptable delivery periods. While this may delay the effective implementation of ACF at the agency level, it will help to guarantee the long-term success of the regulation. Thank you for your consideration. Gary T. Arant General Manager
Attachment:
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2022-07-20 10:33:15
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.