Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 48 for General comments on ARB staff's overall approach on interim GHG significance thresholds under the CEQA. (ceqa-general-ws) - 2nd Workshop.
First Name: Rhys
Last Name: Rowland
Email Address: rrowland@cityofdavis.org
Affiliation: City of Davis
Subject: General Questions/Comments Regarding the Approach
Comment:
o It is good to have a threshold to compare a project to? o How will we know if a study provides a valid number? o What resources can we rely upon to validate numbers related to projects? o How do we evaluate projects that do not fall into these three use categories? Does a “commercial” project include projects which are public/semi-public, office, churches, schools, or other? We think more guidance will be necessary since substantial categories of projects would not be evaluated under the proposed thresholds. o Do we merely condition a project to be in compliance with the standards and have the applicant provide proof?
Attachment:
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2009-01-14 16:40:45
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.
