Comment Log Display

Comment Log Display

Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 75 for Public Input on Cap-and-Trade Auction Proceeds (investmentplan-ws) - 1st Workshop.


First Name: CJ
Last Name: Kawamoto
Email Address: cjkawamoto@yahoo.com
Affiliation:

Subject: NO to Cap and Trade: Bad for California
Comment:
Every industry uses energy. Every industry in CA would have an
increase in costs if you adopt Cap and Trade. Making goods in CA
would become MORE expensive. CA industry would diminish, shrink, as
industry moves elsewhere. Lesser-skilled labor would find fewer
opportunities. Costs for CA goods would increase, become less
competitive. More foreign and out-of-state goods would be imported
for sale to Californians. How is this good for CA industry,
lesser-skilled workers, CA unemployment situation, or residents who
need goods for daily survival? Seems highly damaging to in-state
residents for possible incremental betterment of a transient media
(air). I could more support national or international air emission
standards. This proposed action is wrong - so detrimental to
economy.  Why would CARB brandish another weapon opposing
California's economic recovery?

Attachment:

Original File Name:

Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2012-06-22 09:19:02



If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.


Board Comments Home

preload