Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 3 for 2030 Target Scoping Plan Concept Paper (sp-concept-paper-ws) - 1st Workshop.
First Name: Don
Last Name: Rivenes
Email Address: rivenes@sbcglobal.net
Affiliation: Forest Issues Group
Subject: Comments on the Concept Paper
Comment:
I understand you are interested in comments on the high level concepts presented or alternative concepts, while keeping in mind that some of these are statutory requirements or existing and draft plans that have been under development for a while with a public process. All of the four concepts contain elements for reaching the 2020 GHG Statewide limit mandated by AB 32. Concepts one and four are the ones that attempt to capture the externalities from use of fossil fuels that is causing the catastrophic problem of climate change. Too often environmental costs of production and use of materials is passed on to society and is not reflected in the price of the good. Clean water, soil erosion, and clean air all suffer from pollution. The only solution is to capture these costs in to the price of the goods to society, so that alternatives without these costs will compete fairly. I prefer concept 4, since these costs are reflected in a carbon tax. Concept 1 of cap and trade has partially worked in California, but it still allows the polluter to continue to pollute if they just buy credits from someone who has less pollution. The proceeds from the tax would be best spent on mitigating past degradation of the environment such as low-income areas directly impacted by the fossil fuel plants or building an infrastructure to support a national electric vehicle network, or a short-term subsidy to increase the development of electric cars and buses. The ultimate goal of transportation has to be the elimination of all gas-powered vehicles, not just 1.5 million by a certain year. The State must work with Federal agencies so that all working lands and federal lands are able to employ prescribed burns on a large scale to sequester carbon on an ecological basis restoring large trees rather than encouraging stem trees. This means the ARB has to allow more prescribed burning to reduce the wildfires that cause greater total pollution. It seems that the most important goal at the present time is to get Gov. Brown's executive order seeking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in California to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 enacted by the legislature, so that this scoping paper will be meaningful. Thank you for your consideration.
Attachment:
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2016-07-01 11:09:00
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.