Comment Log Display

Many of the claims made by the IPCC have been disclaimed by a large
number of scientists based on new information and careful review of
the IPCC process.  I would refer any member of the ARB staff to a
website known as Icecap.com for a review of a wide range of
articles on climate change, all of which provide references to
scientific studies that discount manmade climate change due to
GHG's.  How does the ARB consider new information on a subject? 
Why not have a public hearing to consider the facts on what we
really know before drastic measures are put into place?