Comment Log Display

Comment Log Display

Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 2 for General Comments for the GHG Scoping Plan (sp-general-ws) - 1st Workshop.


First Name: jack
Last Name: osborne
Email Address: jho@sonic.net
Affiliation:

Subject: report accuracy
Comment:
you see an example of a problem with all "expert" testimony: most
of it is "MAI", made as instructed. I've read many tax opinions by
large law firms used to promote various tax shelters that I
couldn't have signed. Not even for the $500,000 I guessed the law
firm got for the opinion. For $5 million, well ... The problem is
a general lack of "expert" accountabilty, whether the "experts"
are: CPAs, rating agencies, criminalists, FBI agents, economists,
you name it. If you can't sue 'em over their opinions, they're
worthless. If they can hide behind lawyer-client privilege,
they're worthless.


And that is accurate for all policies that are generated to comply
with a requested solution.

There are no rebuttal arguments, contrary opinions, or anything
that might upset the required solution., especially when it
involves politics or politicans.

Like most things produced on this subject it is biased one way, or
the other, depending on the desires of the requestors of the
opinions.
 

Attachment:

Original File Name:

Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-06-29 12:49:17



If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.


Board Comments Home

preload