Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 23 for Land Use Comments for the GHG Scoping Plan (sp-landuse-ws) - 1st Workshop.
First Name: Ken
Last Name: Grimes
Email Address: kgrimes@walksandiego.org
Affiliation: WalkSanDiego
Subject: WalkSanDiego Comments on Scoping Plan
Comment:
WalkSanDiego is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated to providing a safe, inviting, and convenient pedestrian environment throughout the San Diego region. For the last 10 years, we have worked with the San Diego Association of Governments, local cities, developers, schools, neighborhoods, merchants, and individual residents to identify and fund improvements for walking safety, security, and enjoyment. WalkSanDiego has reviewed the Scoping Plan and is pleased to submit the following comments. Your staff and board are to be congratulated for making appropriate progress on the difficult tasks of examining the myriad available approaches to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG), operating under an urgent time schedule, while simultaneously providing to the public regular updates and opportunities for meaningful input. WalkSanDiego is deeply concerned that the Plan gives little weight to alternative transportation modes, and reforming the continual march of land development into undeveloped areas in a low-density pattern. In our view, and that of most people with whom we work, the time for subsidizing and mandating sprawl must end, and the sooner the better. At the very least, sprawl and walkable communities should be presented as options on a level playing field. Working with many types of residents, from wealthy suburbanites to lower income Hispanic residents, we find that a majority of residents would welcome communities in which walking and bicycling are real choices. This is no doubt true across the state, especially as gasoline prices skyrocket. Children especially need to have other travel options, for their own cognitive development, as well as their health. The epidemic of obesity is not, as some argue, about the consumption of fast food and junk food; rather, it is about a precipitous drop-off in physical activity, primarily due to environmental constraints. This needs to change for many reasons, not the least of which is that sprawl threatens to undermine any real progress on reducing GHG emissions. We have been following with great interest the evolution of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District’s Indirect Source Rule. This regulation rewards compact development offering multiple travel modes, and imposes fees on sprawl on a per housing unit basis. This provides a funding mechanism for transit services, something the state has struggled to do for many years. (In fact, recent state cuts to transit have been an extreme short-term fiscal measure, in the wrong direction for GHG reduction.) The San Joaquin Valley’s Indirect Source Rule is the sort of regulatory program that every region of the state should have, and we urge ARB to add it to the mix of Scoping Plan measures. Further, the state needs to establish a state planning mandate modeled after the most successful programs of other states. These include Wisconsin, Oregon, Maryland, Vermont, and Florida. The program should require California’s laws and local land use regulations to favor low-carbon development and transportation infrastructure. Every city should be mandated to adopt a climate plan that includes reductions in vehicle miles travelled. Finally, the Scoping Plan should emphasize the use of transportation dollars for non-motorized travel and transit services, and reduce its commitment to continuous freeway expansion in a failed bid to reduce congestion. Caltrans should be mandated to weigh greenhouse gasses in every transportation decision, and consider every low-carbon alternative to further freeway building. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. I can be reached at kgrimes@walksandiego.org, 619-544-WALK(9255).
Attachment:
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-07-28 13:54:32
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.