Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 21 for Water Comments for the GHG Scoping Plan (sp-water-ws) - 1st Workshop.
First Name: Keith
Last Name: Roberts
Email Address: kroberts@cityofsacramento.org
Affiliation:
Subject: Water comments
Comment:
Water 1. Page 28, Public Goods Charge on Water: The PGC should be a flat rate that applies equally throughout the State. Alternatively, for residential customers, consider a tiered rate that increases with increased usage. Also, since PGCs would be new to water utilities, consider ramping up over time, starting with the largest water purveyors that have end-use customers. 2. Page 28, Public Goods Charge on Water: Please take into consideration that water rates within the state are tremendously diverse; some areas being 20 times greater than other areas and that projects that are cost effective in one region of the State are not necessarily cost effective in another region; yet on the whole, California is an arid state. To address this problem: without affecting any local jurisdictions water rates to a great extent to foster creativity which should save water better than mandatory reduction targets recommend that approximately [75%] of the PGC that is collected by a jurisdiction is used by the same jurisdiction to improve water efficiency within its service territory. The remaining [25%] should be deposited into an account that is used to competitively fund water conservation projects anywhere in the state; competitiveness should be based primarily on gallons of water saved per dollar invested; other secondary considerations might include Energy intensity of water being saved Quality of water being saved. Ability to defer or eliminate major Statewide water infrastructure projects Other life cycle issues 3. Page 28, Public Goods Charge on Water: recommend that the proposed PGC would include Federal water because: Federal climate legislation is in the works Federally subsidized water provided by Bureau of Land Management (and power provided by Western Area Power Administration) undercuts the need to reduce CO2 by artificially making projects that are cost effective everywhere else not cost effective where subsidized water and power are provided. PGC on Federal water (and power) should only be applied if the Federal water customer is an end-user. If Federal water is provided to a water purveyor, that purveyor will have a PGC of their own.
Attachment:
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-08-01 16:56:46
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.