Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 31 for 2030 Target Scoping Plan Discussion Draft (sp2030disc-dec16-ws) - 1st Workshop.
First Name: Tasha
Last Name: Reddy
Email Address: tasha.reddy@citizensclimate.org
Affiliation: Citizens' Climate Lobby - California
Subject: Considerations for a Carbon Tax or Fee in California
Comment:
Dear CARB and stakeholders, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the CARB 2030 Target Scoping Plan. For context, Citizens’ Climate Lobby is a non-partisan national and international organization of more than 45,000 citizen lobbyist volunteers dedicated to building the political will in Congress for a livable planet. In California, CCL has over 9,000 members who are active in 39 chapters across the entire state. Last December, over 50 members of CCL from around the world participated in the civic engagement sessions at the UN COP21 talks in Paris. We carried with us our advocacy for guiding principles for carbon pricing that underlie all of CCL’s policy development and lobbying efforts. We promote carbon pricing that is: Effective: reduces economy-wide absolute greenhouse gas emissions while supporting domestic economic growth across all sectors. Efficient: minimizes the cost of implementation while maximizing environmental, economic, and social co-benefits. Equitable: avoids disproportionate burdens while protecting vulnerable populations from unjust or negative economic or environmental impacts. These principles reflect those that underpin the international Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition, of which California is an official member. CCL’s principal focus is on lobbying the US Congress to pass a fully-rebated fee on carbon. However, in recognition of the huge role that California plays worldwide in innovative and effective climate action, over the past year we have also reached out to our state legislators in California, as well as selected environmental and environmental justice organizations in the state. Our purpose has been to educate them about the CCL proposal and how a national carbon fee and dividend could co-exist with the state’s current Cap-and-Trade program. In August 2016, the State Assembly and Senate passed Assembly Joint Resolution 43, calling on the US Congress to enact a national carbon-fee-and-dividend program. In the spirit of strengthening California’s effective programs to reduce GHG emissions statewide while providing a model for other states and nations, we offer these comments on the Draft Scoping Plan. Overall, we are happy to see that CARB has committed to analyzing carbon pricing mechanisms in addition to the current Cap-and-Trade program. However, we believe that the Scoping Plan stills lacks critical information necessary for your board, as well as other interested stakeholders, to be able to accurately and comprehensively assess the carbon pricing scenarios contained in the plan, and to evaluate their efficacy in reaching the new 2030 emissions reductions targets. Specifically, we respectfully request that CARB undertake a much more comprehensive analysis and comparison of a carbon tax—with a variety of rebate options and/or reinvestment options—along with reforms to the existing Cap-and-Trade Program. We all need to understand how effective each of these scenarios can be in achieving California’s aggressive 2030 GHG emissions targets. In the attached, we include some information we hope you will consider as you revise the Scoping Plan. Thank you again for this opportunity to comment on your work. Citizens’ Climate Lobby is happy to provide any resources or information we can to support California in developing its climate plans. Please don’t hesitate to contact us. Thank you for doing this critical work for the health and well-being of all Californians and the world. Sincerely, Tasha Reddy, PhD CCL California State Coordinator tasha.reddy@citizensclimate.org
Attachment: www.arb.ca.gov/lists/com-attach/32-sp2030disc-dec16-ws-UTIAZV0wUFwLfwls.pdf
Original File Name: CCL Response to CARB Draft Scoping Plan.pdf
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2016-12-15 15:04:17
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.