Comment Log Display

Comment Log Display

Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 8 for 2022 Scoping Plan Update – Initial Air Quality & Health Impacts and Economic Analyses Results Workshop (sp22-econ-health-ws) - 1st Workshop.


First Name: Janette
Last Name: Wolf
Email Address: janette.wolf@sbcglobal.net
Affiliation:

Subject: Comments on 2022 Scoping Plan
Comment:
My first thought when I read we are trying to be carbon neutral
before 2045 was, "That's way too late." Most plans strive toward
2030, and even that is too late if we want humankind to survive the
changes that will come (are already here) from climate change.

I live in Benicia, and we recently learned that Valero has been
releasing toxins into our air above legal levels FOR YEARS. We have
a lot of back pedaling to do. I have lung issues that worsened when
we moved her 10 years ago, and would not be surprised if Velero's
emissions are to blame. The recent California fires have also
adversely impacted both my lungs and our desired lowering of
emissions.

If we are going to meet this goal, we have to take a look at all
the ways we humans have made the planet sick.  These include
requiring sustainable farming, zero fossil fuels, no fracking, no
mines, and a commitment to keep our water clean. Sustainable
farming will improve air quality.

It means some farmers who historically have been able to use as
much groundwater as they want will have to learn to use less. 

It also means that companies like Nestle must be prohibited from
using unlimited amounts of our water, and selling it. Capitalistic
greed has gotten where we are today.

The canal carrying water from the Delta to Southern California is
also a horrible idea for the environment, and therefore the air.
Delta smelt are threatened, as is the water there, and channeling
it down south will further harm the smelt and other endangered
wildlife in the area.

Here's an idea: if we can ship oil in pipelines hundreds of miles,
why can't we ship water? States like Washington and Oregon get tons
of water every year. Would they be willing to let us ship it down
here, assuming environmental factors don't get in the way?

What about desalination plants? Or recycling and cleaning waste
water? It can certainly be done, even if the public has a distaste
for it.

Or how about making energy from human waste?

There are so many options to ensuring we have clean water now and
for years to come.

I don't envy the job you have before you. My thoughts are only a
quick brainstorm; surely you can all come up with many more.

Best,
~Janette Wolf

Attachment:

Original File Name:

Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2022-04-22 18:09:58



If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.


Board Comments Home

preload