Comment Log Display

Comment Log Display

Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 6 for 2022 Scoping Plan Update - Electricity Sector Technical Workshop (sp22-electricity-ws) - 1st Workshop.


First Name: david
Last Name: bezanson
Email Address: bezanpsy3506@hotmail.com
Affiliation:

Subject: Electricity Sector Workshop - Scoping Plan 2022
Comment:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Yu7p574QcXz85M0U4sYL4lsNFOyCT2rjAyPji5ridII/edit
View the Google link above for references.

                          CARB
         ELECTRICITY SECTOR WORKSHOP : SCOPING PLAN 2022
                                          NOVEMBER 2021

                     Submitted by David Bezanson, Ph.D., CA voter

Thank you for presenting yet another informative workshop re. The
Scoping Plan. This sector is the most important to prioritize
because our grid will power the electrification of other sectors
including industry, transportation, SORE, and buildings . The sum
of this electrification, which displaces primarily fossil fuel
energy, will decrease GHG and toxic/criteria co-pollutant emissions
in CA by well over 50%. Please keep the pace of renewable
generation well ahead of the pace of electrification of other
sectors. In the absence of such pacing, electrification will be
powered by about 40% dirty electricity in the near term.

Throughout this document, renewable energy excludes sources that
spew GHGs or toxics in Scope 2 or Scope 3. Nuclear reactors, e.g.,
emit water vapor and ionizing radiation throughout their operating
phase. Vapor is a GHG and radiation is toxic in any amount of
exposure (see Linear No Threshold model). The lifecycle carbon
intensity of reactors is significantly higher than that of
renewables, , , . Biofuels, dirty H2, biogas, and biomass energy
entail GHG and toxic/criteria pollutants in at least one Scope.

Both utilities and CCAs are publicly-owned in different ways. To
distinguish the two, the acronym SOU (shareholder-owned utilities)
is to be used for the former while POU (publicly-owned utilities)
is to be used for the latter.

Some recommendations herein require collaboration with other
agencies or the Legislature. Please take the lead to decarbonize
the electricity sector promptly. Use 2 year interim targets for
each policy.

TIMELINE TO DECARBONIZE GRID ELECTRICITY

Set a goal of powering the grid with 100% renewables by 2035. Set
interim targets every two years to increase the percent of
renewable electricity by at least 7% while decreasing the percent
of dirty electricity (biomass and fossil) by at least 7%.

DEMAND ATTENUATION

Accelerate the timeline for meeting efficiency goals including
replacement of NG appliances and baseboard heating with more
efficient electric (especially heat pumps) and establishing more
stringent insulation standards for new buildings as well as
retrofits of existing buildings . 

Establish higher surcharges on the highest tiers of electricity and
NG usage. Create 5 tiers The highest tier rate should be at least
triple that of the lowest tier. Rates for each tier of NG should be
at least double the rate for electricity, to internalize
externalities of  fossil energy (NG). Provide partial rebates to
households in the federal poverty range.

One way to decrease emissions and usage of electricity is to retard
economic growth to zero or less. At some point this may be
necessary to solve climate change. In the near future it would help
to decrease the growth rate to 1% and transition from an infinite
growth paradigm to a sustainability paradigm. Using voluntary
educational and financial incentives, the population of CA should
be stabilized at its present level or less. These economic and
population stabilization goals are two of the many proven policies
that are necessary if one adheres to the precautionary principle of
managing the climate crisis. 


COST OF ELECTRICITY

One of the objectives of the federal and CA government is to
decrease the cost/kW of electricity. Failure to internalize
externalized social costs of fossil fuel energy into fossil fuel
prices drives up electricity rates . Policies to internalize costs
are needed and some examples follow.

          Establish a higher fossil fuel production tax (The
current tax is far lower than the tax rate in other states.)

          Increase sales taxes on all fossil fuels (diesel,
gasoline, oil, propane, NG, LNG, etc.) and bio-energy

          Raise the floor price of allowances at Cap & Trade
auctions to the cost of C removal (currently $150 - $600 per MT),
sunset free allowances by 2023, and discontinue handing out free
allowances.

          Create a Clean Electricity Performance Plan akin to the
one that was deleted from the federal reconciliation bill (Build
Back Better). SOUs and POUs that generate/procure at least 5% more
renewable energy than in the prior year would receive an incentive
while those failing to meet it would be penalized. This will scale
up renewable energy, driving down the price.

Rapidly phase out the use of reactors and of biomass electricity.
The former has a cost per kW that is 4 to 5 times higher than that
of renewables while the latter has a cost per kW that is about 50%
higher than that of renewables. Each is heavily subsidized.


BENEFIT : COST ANALYSIS

Public statements from CEC, CARB, and CPUC indicate that the cost
of a rapid transition to renewables is higher than a transition
that reaches neutrality by 2045. This is true if the gross
investment in renewables is the sole metric. However, research
indicates that the maximum net benefit : cost ratio is achieved by
a rapid transition. Energy and non-energy benefits include public
health and consequent increases in productivity, increased net job
growth in the energy sector, increased income tax revenue,
increased GDP, decreased cost of electricity, EJ, avoidance of
fossil fuel "shortages" and price spikes, deceleration of climate
change, more food security, and a more sustainable economy. Because
the fossil fuel industry has a rate of occupational injuries that
exceeds that of most construction sectors, Workers' Compensation
claims would subside. In addition, the influence of the fossil fuel
industry upon climate legislation would diminish. There is probably
a massive economic value of this curtailed influence and research
is needed to quantify such , , , ., , , , ,  ,.

Define EJ zones and toxic hot spots on the scale of miles instead
of meters. Urban areas that are up to 100 miles downwind from toxic
and criteria pollutant sources may be showered with some of these
toxics. Some of these, e.g., PM, may remain airborne for a week.
This is critical when performing cost : benefit analyses.

Another model for evaluating policies to further the transition
from current BAU to C neutral is Return on Investment. This would
examine the costs of achieving various kinds of returns and the
sustainability of returns. 

In 2018, 8.7 million people suffered premature mortality from
fossil fuel industry emissions. A 2021 study estimated 10.2 million
, . (Note that the studies calculated mortality only from PM.
Combustion of FF emits about one dozen toxics. These two studies
did not estimate mortality from the other toxic co-pollutants.)
Estimates of the number of annual premature deaths from fossil fuel
PM in the US range from 335,000 and 350,000. Using 340,000 and
dividing this by the population of the US in 2018 (327 million)
equals 0.1%. The CA population in 2018 was 39 million. 0.1% of 39
million is 39,000. The value of a statistical life in the US is
$10,000,000 (8, 9,10). 39,000 times ten million is $ 390 billion ,
,  .

CLEAN FIRM 24/7 SOURCES

The source to scale ahead of all others in geothermal. CA has
extensive geothermal potential. The co-development of geothermal
energy and lithium extraction from the same regions is being
studied by The Lithium Valley Commission of the CEC. Co-develop
geothermal generation in nearby states with natural geothermal
resources and increase imports to displace fossil energy imports.

The second priority is to scale the most cost-effective forms of
storage to increase the capacity factor of renewables.
Commercially-available options include various battery
technologies, renewable electrolytic H2, and hydro.

The third priority is to replace stationary fossil fuel generators
with renewable electrolytic H2 fuel cell generators .

Due to cost, a fourth priority - tidal - is to be studied every two
or three years by reviewing  cost : benefit research. Expedite
development when the cost : benefit ratio is near that of other
renewables. 

RELIABLE GRANULARITY 24/7 and ACROSS SEASONS

Build excess renewable generation capacity. Use it to store energy
for use when demand exceeds supply. An example is salt caverns for
renewable electrolytic H2. See SB 67, introduced in 2021 and
destined to be a 2-year bill for 2022 for policy guidelines.
Bill Text - SB-67 Clean energy: California 24/7 Clean Energy
Standard Program.
Scale smart grids and microgrids interfaced with community and
rooftop solar, to improve granularity and resilience of DRE

Incentivize installation of PV solar panels over parking lots,
freeways, driveways, canals, and floatation atop reservoirs. This
form of DER has multiple benefits including improved grid
resilience. Fast track offshore wind turbine energy .

CARBON CAPTURE ENGINEERING

Smokestack carbon capture is a cost-prohibitive, unproven
technology that increases energy prices (e.g., of NG and
electricity). Research that examines the complete lifecycle of
emissions and finds net capture has not been published. It does not
decrease toxic or criteria co-pollutants. By extending the number
of years of reliance upon fossil fuel energy, it increases
cumulative toxic and criteria co-pollutants emitted over the years.
See the link below for guidelines on using carbon capture
technologies and references to the literature.
CARBON CAPTURE DECISION TREE - Google Docs
Instead of using smokestack carbon capture on fossil fuel power
plants, these plants should be replaced by renewable energy/storage
plants. This has a superior cost : benefit profile than adding
smokestack capture to fossil fuel power plants. 

NATURAL GAS

Do not use a mix of RNG and NG for residential buildings, due to
health hazards.Do not use a mix of H2 and fossil NG in any
pipelines.To achieve our climate and emissions objectives, the use
of all forms of NG needs to be swiftly phased out. We have ample
renewable and storage resources to retire NG. Replace the use of NG
in buildings with electricity, for which we have a distribution
network. Retire NG power plants by 2030.

HYDROGEN ,, 

Permit the generation and sale only of renewable electrolytic H2 in
CA effective 2023. If other H2 generation technologies are invented
that are combustion-free and have a comparable lifecycle carbon
intensity, permit the generation and sale of such when each becomes
commercially feasible.

Construct new dedicated renewable H2 pipelines only in industrial
zones outside of residential areas. Do not use blends of NG and H2
in existing NG pipelines. Even sections of NG pipelines that are
currently leak-free are unsuitable because H2 molecules are much
smaller than CH4 molecules and H2 will leak, especially when
transported under typical pressures used for NG. Leakage of each
gas is inefficient, toxic, and presents risk of fire and
explosion.

Develop programs for conversion of metals and concrete manufacture
to renewable electrolytic H2 powered or 100% renewable
electricity-powered. These are commercially available and are
further decarbonized by efficient electric arc furnaces for steel
and cement substitutes that require lower energy input for concrete
manufacture. 

IMPORTED ELECTRICITY

Import only renewable energy. Upgrade our high-voltage transmission
line network connecting CA to other Western states and B.C. These
upgrades will enable us to profit from exporting electricity. It
will also improve 24/7 reliability of electricity supplies in
networked states including CA.



                                                      


                                                          
CONCLUSION


Target 2035 as the year to achieve powering our grid with 100%
combustion-free and toxin-free renewable electricity. Establish
aggressive interim targets every two years, especially during the
initial 8 years .Use modular design principles to accelerate
scaling  Clean energy is favored by over 80% of voters nationwide
.

See the graph near the end of this 3 minute video on net
zero.Please make plans to achieve the lowest emissions trajectory .

 

Attachment: www.arb.ca.gov/lists/com-attach/6-sp22-electricity-ws-BmNTOQdjBzcFdwBy.pdf

Original File Name: electricitySectorCARB2022.pdf

Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2021-11-18 14:42:20



If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.


Board Comments Home

preload