Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 103 for Public Comments for LCFS pathway applications (tier2lcfspathways-ws) - 2nd Workshop.
First Name: Joshua
Last Name: Kehoe
Email Address: firstname.lastname@example.org
Affiliation: Private Individual
Subject: Application No B0251
Dear CARB Personnel: I appreciate the opportunity to provide public comment on the various pathways proposed by DGD. I looked forward to reading the Lifecycle Analysis Report. It was a very quick read, as reading large sections of blacked out "CBI" doesn't take a lot of time or effort. While I understand DGD's desire to not release certain data, they even blacked out the "simplified process" diagram as well as pretty much anything that is interesting. For instance, what rough percentage of finished product will be transported to California by ocean-going tanker versus by rail? Which mode of transport results in a higher CI score for any given feedstock? It appears the listed CI score they calculate will default to the highest of the calculated CI scores for any given feedstock, but it would be interesting to see just how much a real-world difference it makes. Oh well, more curiosity on my part than anything earth-shattering. I again appreciate the opportunity to leave comments. Sincerely, Josh Kehoe
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2022-03-15 15:14:06
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.