Comment Log Display
Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 16 for Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust for California (vw-mititrust-pl-ws) - 1st Workshop.
First Name: Richard
Last Name: Boggs
Email Address: tugs@earthlink.net
Affiliation: EnerYacht LLC
Subject: Aftermarket vs replacement
Comment:
While replacing an engine with new benefits engine manufacturers it may impose crippling costs on many operators, particularly in the marine sector. It appears that the concept of replacement was developed before a source of aftermarket aftertreatment systems was available. If the objective is to reduce emissions, regulatory measures must focus on the level of emissions leaving the stack, not on forcing users to purchase new engines. In the marine sector this has worked very well for sulfur emissions reduction. Because the supply of low sulfur fuels is problematic, and no other practical alternatives exist, both EPA and IMP permit the use of aftermarket sulfur scrubbers. We should approach NOx emissions with the same goal, to reduce emissions not promote engine replacement as the only solution. We now have the technology to achieve emissions goals without imposing such high costs to users. Current thinking is very much a case of throwing out the baby with the bathwater. A large part of the problem in the marine sector exists because the market is so small that engine manufacturers simple ignore that market. Our customers operate large motoryachts which use generators that are at the lower power level at which EPA Tier 4 or IMO Tier 3 standards apply in order to enter the North American NOx Emissions Control Area. Because the size of the engines fitted to most of these vessels is not worth an engine manufacturer's attention it has become, for all practical purposes, impossible to fit generators sized for the application. In cooperation with our German partner, we manufacture aftertreatment systems sized and developed for this niche market but because current regulations prohibit certification by any route other than the engine manufacturer, it may become impossible to build yachts in certain sizes. Because larger generators currently available use such large aftertreatment systems the volume required to fit those generators in engine rooms creates a cascade of regulatory barriers based on vessel tonnage (volume) and problems associated with oversized generators. The unintended consequences of current regulations create serious problems for the yachting industry which, in my own state of Florida alone, brings in more than $11 billion annually and employs more than 136,000 people in Broward County. Because current regulations were developed before any other solution was available, users are being forced to destroy perfectly useable engines and spend very large amounts (even with government assistance) to replace those engines that simply do not exist on the market today. We can retrofit aftertreatment systems that meet all emissions standards and deliver the environmental benefits the regulations were intended to provide.
Attachment:
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2017-10-23 12:03:58
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.